[jbosstools-dev] How should we deal with components of projects which have not changed since JBT 4.1.0.Final (eg., jbosstools-base/runtime) ?
Max Rydahl Andersen
manderse at redhat.com
Mon Sep 30 05:17:41 EDT 2013
+1
This is similar to what JBTIS does.
/max
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 10:28:36AM -0700, Denis Golovin wrote:
>I would prefer to have one place where we can configure what is included
>into release.
>Aggregate build seems to be a good candidate for this place. Why not
>just point to exact version
>2.1.0.Final-v20130717-0450-B102 of runtime feature in aggregation update
>site?
>
>Denis
>
>On 09/27/2013 09:10 AM, Nick Boldt wrote:
>> In looking at the JBT 4.1.1.Alpha2 build [1], I see that some features
>> have not yet changed since JBT 4.1.0.Final [2]. This is fine for a
>> project like GWT or Freemarker, where the entire project is versioned
>> the same way and we can simply include the previous .Final release, but
>> for a subcomponent of a project, like the runtime component in
>> jbosstools-base [3], this presents a question.
>>
>> [1] http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/nightly/core/4.1.kepler/
>>
>> [2] http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/stable/kepler/
>>
>> [3]
>> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/builds/staging/jbosstools-base_41/all/repo/
>>
>> Currently, the base build [3] is producing this plugin:
>>
>> org.jboss.tools.runtime.core 2.1.0.Alpha2-v20130927-0137-B114
>>
>> But the JBT 4.1.1.Alpha2 build [1] contains this version, which is
>> code-wise identical except for the qualifier change in the manifest.
>>
>> org.jboss.tools.runtime.core 2.1.0.Final-v20130717-0450-B102
>>
>> Where it becomes an issue is that when we start building 4.1.1.Final in
>> November, we will be including both 2.1.0.Final-v20130717-0450-B102
>> (from JBT 4.1.0.Final) and 2.1.0.Final-v20131200-0000-Bxxx (from JBT
>> 4.1.1.Final). Since these are bitwise identical, there's no point making
>> users update from an identical feature or plugin to a newer identical
>> version.
>>
>> So how do we prevent the build from including a newer-versioned but
>> identical feature or plugin?
>>
>> The only thing I can currently think of is to *exclude* these features
>> from the base_41 update site [3] so that only the older version from [2]
>> will be included.
>>
>> This is basically the process I used to build JBT 4.1.0.1 - I excluded
>> everything from jbosstools-central's site/category.xml except the
>> feature which had actually changed [4].
>>
>> [4]
>> https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-central/commit/16279020cbf872f4eac59a36a77df01edb2ed832
>>
>> Looking for feedback here -- is this a good idea?
>>
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>jbosstools-dev mailing list
>jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
More information about the jbosstools-dev
mailing list