[jbosstools-dev] Can we bump TP in jbosstools-4.3.x to 4.51.2.Beta1?

[Nick Boldt]

We have in the past done updates to JBT / JBDS which *force* users to move
up to a SR1 or SR2 minimum but we've also done LOTS of releases where it
was optional.

So, yes, you need PM (Alexey) and QE (Len) to agree to this change. I
suspect Max will disagree to it.

On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Mickael Istria <mistria at redhat.com> wrote:

> On 12/09/2015 03:56 PM, André Dietisheim wrote:
>
> I added org.eclipse.swt 3.104.1 as required plugins to openshift.ui and
> express.ui, shouldnt this trigger updated swt to get installed along JBT?
> https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-openshift/pull/838
>
> People who're using Mars.0 and installing this OpenShift version will see
> a remediation page that will force them to update their whole IDE to Mars.1
> (because SWT version is hardcoded in Platform, and using newer SWT implies
> using newer Platform).
> I don't know if this is something we want to enforce or not. I'm
> personally OK with dictating users to use the newer/better version, but
> you'll need other people to agree on that before forcing such a change.
>
> --
> Mickael Istria
> Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
> My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
> <http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jbosstools-dev mailing list
> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>



-- 
Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
http://nick.divbyzero.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20151209/62c1b6cf/attachment.html