[jbosstools-dev] Mechanism for deciding which archetype will be used for target runtime.

[Fred Bricon]

The whole logic is implemented here:
https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-central/blob/master/examples/plugins/org.jboss.tools.maven.project.examples/src/org/jboss/tools/maven/project/examples/internal/stacks/StacksArchetypeUtil.java#L174

Because EAP 7 is a JavaEE 7 server, my guess is it *should* use the first
Java EE 7 archetype available, instead of the jboss as 7 one. But,
something seems wrong, this needs more investigation. Please open a ticket
in JIRA

On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Radim Hopp <rhopp at redhat.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen <manderse at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 6 Oct 2015, at 13:01, Radim Hopp wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>> I guess, that the main mechanism for deciding which archetype will be
>>> used
>>> for which server runtime is stacks.yaml, but what about runtimes, which
>>> are
>>> not in stacks.yaml yet?
>>>
>>>
>> mainly a question for Fred and Rob.
>>
>> For example now, when I try to create EAR project with target runtime EAP7
>>> (EAP7 is not yet in stacks.yaml), it
>>> creates
>>> org.jboss.spec.archetypes:jboss-javaee6-webapp-ear-archetype:7.1.3.Final
>>> (archetype for JBossAS 7) and this doesn't seem right.
>>>
>>
>> Which one would you expect when unknown ? we fall back to the latest
>> working version afaik.
>
>
> I would expect it also, but at least for this archetype, when EAP7 is used
> as target, JBoss AS 7.1 archetype version is used instead of EAP6.4 version
> we both would expect.
>
>
>>
>>
>> Another example: EAR project with target runtime WFLY9
>>> -> rg.wildfly.archetype:wildfly-javaee7-webapp-ear-archetype:8.2.0.Final.
>>> This looks pretty ok, as this is WFLY8.2 archetype and WFLY9 archetypes
>>> are
>>> not released yet.
>>>
>>
>> Neither is EAP7.
>>
>> When you use WF9 you use WF8 adapter right ? thus that will give you WF8
>> examples.
>>
>> Seems like stacks.yml need some updates. Fred/Rob ?
>> /max
>> http://about.me/maxandersen
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jbosstools-dev mailing list
> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20151007/da97536c/attachment-0001.html