[jbosstools-dev] Any way to make FreeMarker IDE fixes avilable with less delay?

[Nick Boldt]

Once PRs are reviewed and approved, commits pushed to github will be
built automatically when github is checked for changes (once every 8
hours).

Jobs are here, for the 4.3.x & master branch.

https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/view/JBossTools/view/JBossTools_4.3.mars/job/jbosstools-freemarker_4.3.mars/

https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/view/JBossTools/view/JBossTools_Master/job/jbosstools-freemarker_master/

Results are then built here:

http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/snapshots/builds/jbosstools-freemarker_4.3.mars/latest/all/repo/

http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/neon/snapshots/builds/jbosstools-freemarker_master/latest/all/repo/

On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 5:26 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen
<manderse at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 8 Apr 2016, at 8:34, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>
>> Thank you very much! To be perfectly clear, I didn't come here to
>> complain and force JBoss employees to do this. I'm asking if there's a
>> way to change the overall process somehow. Perhaps not, but, who
>> knows...
>
> There is - we have an updatesite for freemarker site that builds every
> night, so you can releases/fixes from it more or less immediately.
>
> To get more content in, we need more content in PR's to the repos and if
> someone
> wants to step up to review and test PR's let us know.
>
> As you notice if we come aware of something going stale we do react - to
> avoid it going
> stale repeatedly we need someone to have time and skills to push
> content.
>
> If it was something else you had in mind let me know. In any case, we
> are pretty open
> on what happens with freemarker tooling as long as it keeps (within
> reason) being compatible with
> multiple freemarker versions so it can be used in real projects that end
> up having wide
> range of freemarker content.
>
> /max
>
>>
>>
>> Friday, April 8, 2016, 12:00:19 AM, Alexey Kazakov wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry for such long delays.
>>> I pushed the 4-month old PR to the master. We are currently very busy
>>> preparing JBoss Tools 4.3.1 release (should happen in two weeks) but
>>> then we will find some time to review the other two PRs.
>>>
>>> Thanks for your contributions!
>>>
>>> On 04/07/2016 05:39 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>>>> I'm a contributor at the FreeMarker project, and would like to help
>>>> maintaining JBoss Tools / FreeMarker IDE
>>>> (org.jboss.ide.eclipse.freemarker). The problem I'm facing is that
>>>> pull requests get merged with too big delay. For example, I have a
>>>> few
>>>> simple pull requests waiting for 4 months now, because of the
>>>> limited
>>>> resources available for reviewing them (as I was told). I wonder if
>>>> I
>>>> can help improving this situation somehow.
>>>>
>>>> If the above can be addressed, then I guess I could specify the
>>>> nightly build update site URL to the users, so that they aren't
>>>> affected by the release cycle of JBoss Tools. After all, FreeMarker
>>>> IDE is technically quite independent of it.
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks,
>>  Daniel Dekany
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>
>
> /max
> http://about.me/maxandersen
> _______________________________________________
> jbosstools-dev mailing list
> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev



-- 
Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
http://nick.divbyzero.com