[jbosstools-dev] Known issues w/ JBT 4.4.0.Alpha1 & DS 10.0.0.Alpha1 bits staged for QE

[Max Rydahl Andersen]

On 2 May 2016, at 18:00, Paul Leacu wrote:

>    Hey -
>        I've been building a local JBTIS TP based on Neon.  We have a 
> chicken-and-egg issue
>    with IS dependency on JBT core.  Now that we've got a staging 
> version I should have an
>    Alpha1 JBTIS TP released this week.

great - so coordinate with Nick when to make sense to enable it again. 
The nice things about the de.config file is that it is trivial to turn 
on/off.

/max

>                 --paull
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Max Rydahl Andersen" <manderse at redhat.com>
>> To: "Nick Boldt" <nboldt at redhat.com>
>> Cc: jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> Sent: Monday, May 2, 2016 3:55:58 AM
>> Subject: Re: [jbosstools-dev] Known issues w/ JBT 4.4.0.Alpha1 & DS 
>> 10.0.0.Alpha1 bits staged for QE
>>
>> On 2 May 2016, at 2:43, Nick Boldt wrote:
>>
>>> I could remove it from the ide-config.properties, sure, but in the
>>> absence of instructions from Paul, Alexey, or yourself, I just 
>>> assumed
>>> we'd use the current staged IS bits for Mars in the current JBT/DS
>>> staged bits for Neon.
>>> And in doing so, something went awry, as
>>> reported in the above JIRAs.
>>>
>>> We don't have a clear policy for what to do when starting the Alphas
>>> for a new JBT/DS when there are no IS bits available. We should
>>> probably write one.
>>
>> The clear policy we have is to not mix up Eclipse release train TP 
>> sites
>> (unless properly vetted and tested for sanity).
>>
>> Been the same for years IMO.
>>
>> So if you are waiting for me to say something: If integration stack
>> cannot be installed
>> into Neon without problems - please remove Integration Stack
>> setup for Neon until IS itself can provide a working solution or 
>> judge
>> if the problem is tolerable.
>> Do please notify Paul about the change in a jira and mail so he knows
>> about it.
>>
>>
>> /max
>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 5:51 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen
>>> <manderse at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> So for now, JBTIS content can't be installed into JBT 
>>>>> 4.4.0.Alpha1,
>>>>> but that's OK because anything we'd be installing is the 
>>>>> Mars-based
>>>>> stuff, not the Neon-based stuff.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Not following the logic in that statement. Installing mars based is
>>>> what we
>>>> would
>>>> expect at this time since no Neon available, but we shouldn't be
>>>> pointing to
>>>> something
>>>> that adds a Eclipse Mars based TP. Why is IS not just removed from
>>>> our Neon
>>>> metadata
>>>> until it has working setup so we avoid adding Mars update sites ?
>>>>
>>>> /max
>>>> http://about.me/maxandersen
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
>>> Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
>>> http://nick.divbyzero.com
>>
>>
>> /max
>> http://about.me/maxandersen
>> _______________________________________________
>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>


/max
http://about.me/maxandersen