[jbosstools-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Closed: (JBIDE-6686) Hibernate platform names for JPA Facet are misleading/incorrect

[Jiri Peterka (JIRA)]

     [ https://jira.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-6686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Jiri Peterka closed JBIDE-6686.
-------------------------------

    Assignee: Jiri Peterka  (was: Dmitry Geraskov)


Verified in JBDS 4.0.0.v201008232021N-H413-M2, Linux 64, JDK 1.6. Currently JPA Facets is set correctly and Hibernate Platform JPA version is based on previous page JPA Configuration setting. 

> Hibernate platform names for JPA Facet are misleading/incorrect
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JBIDE-6686
>                 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-6686
>             Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Hibernate
>    Affects Versions: 3.2.0.M1
>            Reporter: Max Rydahl Andersen
>            Assignee: Jiri Peterka
>             Fix For: 3.2.0.M2
>
>
> We seem to provide two platform names under JPA Facet:
> "Hibernate" & "Hibernate jpa 2.0"
> 1) Both shows up no matter if I choose JPA 1 or JPA 2 on the facet page, that does not sound correct to me.
> 2) Why is "jpa" lower case ?
> 3) Why does one has a version and the on none ?
> 4) Shouldn't these be named after the main Hibernate version they target ? i.e. Hibernate 3.3-3.4 and Hibernate 3.5 ?
> Or simply Hibernate EntityManager 3.4, Hibernate EntityManager 3.5 ? (need to check the version numbers if they are correct, since i'm just 
> speaking of memory here)

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira