[jbosstools-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBIDE-4859) Create new categories for JBT/JBDS update sites

John Verhaeg (JIRA) jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Thu Jan 28 12:00:19 EST 2010


    [ https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-4859?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12509079#action_12509079 ] 

John Verhaeg commented on JBIDE-4859:
-------------------------------------

Wrt the numbered items in my last post:

1) Ah, didn't realize that.  That blows.

2) For this and most of the remaining items, I'm looking at this from a data services perspective (even though that won't be a part of JBT until a post-3.1 release).  I'm not suggesting web development not related to Java EE, but that some web development are useful to work with in the tooling without any need for a server.  For instance, Teiid has the ability to create web services mapped to back-end (usually relational) data without the need for the user to ever touch an actual server; we simply need a WSDL and access to the backend data.  Having said that, this is probably the "weakest" suggestion I had for a possible change.

3) The multiple categories idea seems like it might have merit, but I completely disagree with your assessment of the purpose of Hibernate/JPA and Drools.  We've used both technologies in conjunction with Teiid, Teiid Designer, and ModeShape, and none of our scenarios had anything to do with a server or J2EE.  I understand that the JPA spec is technically defined within the scope of the Java EE spec, but 1) that going to change shortly, and 2) there has never been any requirement to have J2EE.  Similarly, drools is really just a rules engine and has no direct tie-in to web services or SOA.  jBPM does, but not drools.  And again, we've made use of drools within ModeShape in areas that had nothing to do with SOA.

4) Smooks is by definition a tool for transforming data to and from XML, so I don't understand why it wouldn't intuitively be found by the user under an XML category.

I guess ignore the DTP reference for now; I'm thinking of future JBT extensions we had in mind for DTP, not DTP proper.  However, wrt Hibernate, even as an organization, we now manage Teiid, ModeShape, and Hibernate all under the Data Services umbrella.

So I guess maybe none of my suggestions are necessarily important immediately since there isn't yet a set of data services tool within JBT, I just thought it might help us transition a bit in that direction.

> Create new categories for JBT/JBDS update sites
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JBIDE-4859
>                 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-4859
>             Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Build/Releng
>    Affects Versions: 3.1.0.M3
>            Reporter: Nick Boldt
>            Assignee: Max Rydahl Andersen
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 3.1.0.CR2
>
>         Attachments: jbtupdatesitesuggestion.png, screenshot-1.jpg, Screenshot-1.png, Screenshot-2.png, site.xml
>
>
> Renamed to capture current thrust of issue: should we have more categories than we currently do on the update site? Expose more/less features? This is a branding/marketing/ease of use question, so for now I'm bouncing it over to Max for comments.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        


More information about the jbosstools-issues mailing list