[jbosstools-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBIDE-8667) improve publishing of component sites using composite metadata so that content doesn't vanish and break downstream jobs

Nick Boldt (JIRA) jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Fri Aug 19 16:50:17 EDT 2011


    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12622262#comment-12622262 ] 

Nick Boldt commented on JBIDE-8667:
-----------------------------------

Well, it's certainly better than the old approach of destructively rsynching ON TOP of the previous one. Now at least the time required to move from x to x+1 is seconds instead of minutes, and the old bits are still available so that if you ping the site during a build you can still resolve both x and x-1 builds.

Why won't it work?

> improve publishing of component sites using composite metadata so that content doesn't vanish and break downstream jobs
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JBIDE-8667
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8667
>             Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Build/Releng
>    Affects Versions: 3.3.0.M1
>            Reporter: Nick Boldt
>            Assignee: Nick Boldt
>             Fix For: 3.3.0.M3
>
>         Attachments: screenshot103.png
>
>
> (2011-04-01 10:11:04) nickboldt: and while I'd love to do:
> (2011-04-01 10:11:12) nickboldt: mkdir whatever-new
> (2011-04-01 10:11:22) nickboldt: rsync newstuff whatever-new
> (2011-04-01 10:11:25) nickboldt: rm -fr whatever
> (2011-04-01 10:11:29) nickboldt: mv whatever-new whatever
> (2011-04-01 10:11:43) nickboldt: so that the time between "it's there" and "it's there and updated" is less
> (2011-04-01 10:11:52) nickboldt: I CANNOT with the current infra we have
> (2011-04-01 10:12:03) nickboldt: instead I can do an rsync --delete and push into the same folder on top
> (2011-04-01 10:12:16) nickboldt: but that means that the metadata will oft be out of whack w.r.t the site content
> (2011-04-01 10:12:17) maxandersen: hmmm
> (2011-04-01 10:12:41) nickboldt: if you can think of a way to do a "push then rename" instead of "push into existing and clean out cruft"
> (2011-04-01 10:12:51) nickboldt: over sftp via a script (non-interactive) then I'm all ears
> (2011-04-01 10:13:26) nickboldt: I can't push a script there and run it, or simply connect over ssh and run a script directly
> (2011-04-01 10:13:35) maxandersen: well what I was thinking was to do a push of new site into new dir, push site.xml/compositewhatever pointing to new dir and then rsync delete the existing one..
> (2011-04-01 10:14:10) maxandersen: sftp rm should work?
> (2011-04-01 10:14:13) nickboldt: MIGHT be able to do sftp delete
> (2011-04-01 10:14:39) maxandersen: if you control it with a composite artifact you dont need to rename anything
> (2011-04-01 10:14:51) maxandersen: except the content pointer in there which you know "locally"
> (2011-04-01 10:15:01) nickboldt: true... so I'd need a tool to do a one line swap in the composite*.xml files
> (2011-04-01 10:15:13) nickboldt: remove ref to old site, replace w/ ref to new site
> (2011-04-01 10:15:17) nickboldt: and then delete the old one
> 1. generate composite metadata files on the fly
> 2. publish that into root dir, all/repo/
> 3. purge previous build's folder over scripted sftp?

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        


More information about the jbosstools-issues mailing list