[jbosstools-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBIDE-9219) Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split

Nick Boldt (JIRA) jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Wed Aug 31 13:33:26 EDT 2011


    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12625515#comment-12625515 ] 

Nick Boldt commented on JBIDE-9219:
-----------------------------------

Yeah, I guess a profile would work too. This just seemed easier to maintain. (?)

> Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JBIDE-9219
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219
>             Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: bpel, bpm, drools, esb, jbpm, modeshape, pi4soa, Savara, smooks, teiid
>    Affects Versions: 3.3.0.M1
>            Reporter: Brian Fitzpatrick
>            Assignee: Nick Boldt
>             Fix For: 3.3.0.M3
>
>
> This arose in an e-mail from Nick: 
> "Should we be splitting the cont's and test builds apart so they don't include the SOA components in the Core builds?
> Realize that I split up the aggregate + JBDS update site builds, but not the all-in-one tests job or the "does everything compile?" jobs."
> I think the answer is "yes" we need to do these things. The upside is that it should speed up the component builds on both sides of the equation. The downside is that it means more work for Nick and/or Doug. 

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        


More information about the jbosstools-issues mailing list