[jbosstools-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBIDE-8330) JBPM 3 process definiton wizard creates files with new (JBPM 4?) naming convention
Max Rydahl Andersen (JIRA)
jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Tue Feb 8 05:53:42 EST 2011
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8330?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12580694#comment-12580694 ]
Max Rydahl Andersen commented on JBIDE-8330:
--------------------------------------------
joe, just to be clear we didnt add this in a "maintanence" version; we added it in a new release of it and we added it since there were the limitation that there could only be one process per folder. Now both approaches are supported - but yes we create the more flexible layout by default since we saw no reason to force the more rigid approach.
The "old" form is still supported and I don't see how this can break your patterns if you still name your files processdefinition.xml ?
> JBPM 3 process definiton wizard creates files with new (JBPM 4?) naming convention
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-8330
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8330
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: jbpm
> Affects Versions: 3.2.0.M1, 3.2.0.CR1
> Reporter: joe freeman
> Assignee: Koen Aers
> Fix For: 3.2.1
>
> Original Estimate: 0 minutes
> Remaining Estimate: 0 minutes
>
> We just upgraded to the 3.2.0 JBoss JBPM editing tools and the behavior has changed for the definition creation wizard. It looks like the JBPM 3 wizard now creates files with the JBPM 4 naming convention.It used to create files with the name gpd.xml, processdefinition.xml and processimage.jpg. Now it creates files with <def_name>.jpdl.xml, process.jpg and .<def_name>.gpd.xml.
> This broke our file system loader code and we can't find any release notes or Jira tickets that describe why or when this change was made. I found notes in http://docs.jboss.org/tools/whatsnew/jbpm/jbpm-news-3.2.0.M1.html that show that this was intentional.
> I guess this could be changed to an enhancement that there should have been a property or something to support the old format. This is a moderately large change to a product that is essentially in maint mode.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the jbosstools-issues
mailing list