[jbosstools-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBIDE-8068) BPEL Editor has problems dealing with abstract processes
Brian Fitzpatrick (JIRA)
jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Thu Feb 24 09:50:07 EST 2011
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12584417#comment-12584417 ]
Brian Fitzpatrick commented on JBIDE-8068:
------------------------------------------
Bob, bumped to 3.2.1 for now. If not 3.2.1, should probably go in a 3.3 release or LATER.
> BPEL Editor has problems dealing with abstract processes
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-8068
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8068
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: bpel
> Affects Versions: 3.2.0.Beta2
> Reporter: Robert (Bob) Brodt
> Assignee: Robert (Bob) Brodt
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.2.1
>
> Original Estimate: 0 minutes
> Remaining Estimate: 0 minutes
>
> For abstract processes, the namespace is "http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsbpel/2.0/process/abstract" but much of the editor code simply assumes that the namespace is always "http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsbpel/2.0/process/executable". This causes all kinds of problems when doing lookup of namespace prefixes to identify BEPL "built-in" features (e.g. fault names). This is also the reason why the BPELContentDescriber does not recognize an abstract process as a BPEL file.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the jbosstools-issues
mailing list