[jbosstools-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-15482) Replace staging & staging.previous (two builds w/ reused URLs) with uniquely timestamped build URLs and auto-regenerated composite*.xml files

[Mickael Istria (JIRA)]

    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-15482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12813498#comment-12813498 ] 

Mickael Istria commented on JBIDE-15482:
----------------------------------------

> Mickael Istria Are you really suggesting we use http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/builds/staging/<jobName>/all/repo/<jobName>/<build#>/all/repo ? that's longer and more redundant than just using builds/staging/CI/<jobName><build#>/all/repo/ ... and since builds/staging/CI/<jobName> is *already* a composite of the child builds, we already have a static URL for "latest build of a given component's job for a given stream".

In such case, we can get rid of one <jobName>.
What I don't understand is the benefit of renaming staging to staging/CI . It just adds maintenance effort. What kind of other suff will we have in this builds/staging? To me it just seems like there are and there will only be output of CI.
And even if we want to adopt this "CI", shouldn't it be part of another iteration?
                
> Replace staging & staging.previous (two builds w/ reused URLs) with uniquely timestamped build URLs and auto-regenerated composite*.xml files
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JBIDE-15482
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-15482
>             Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: build, updatesite
>            Reporter: Nick Boldt
>            Assignee: Nick Boldt
>             Fix For: 4.1.1.Alpha2
>
>
> Be it proposed:
> {quote}
> that instead of an in-place move which reuses
> generic folder names like "staging" and "staging.previous", we
> composite build output using unique names like
> 2013-08-09_05-05-26-B7222/ or 2013-08-13_10-05-28-B7255
> {quote}
> We therefore need:
> a) to regenerate the composite site each time there's a new build
> published, in order to remove the oldest and add the newest (keeping
> only the Nth and N-1rst builds)
> (I have a script that might already work for this, or would need
> tweaking.)
> b) heuristics to determine when an older (N-2, N-3, ... N-z) build is
> no longer needed, perhaps simply by assuming no one needs it after 
> 24hrs?
> 24 hours should be more that enough.
> c) a cleanup script which can purge all but the builds which are no
> more than 1 day old, keeping at all times at least two builds (N and 
> N-1)
> (I have a script that already does this for folders like
> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/builds/nightly/core/trunk/ but
> might need to be tweaked to work for a new pattern of
> staging/\$\{JOB_NAME}/<BUILD_ID>/ .)
> {quote}

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira