[jbosstools-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (JBTIS-199) Update category names for installer.

[Paul Leacu (JIRA)]

Paul Leacu created JBTIS-199:
--------------------------------

             Summary: Update category names for installer.
                 Key: JBTIS-199
                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTIS-199
             Project: JBoss Tools Integration Stack
          Issue Type: Task
      Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
    Affects Versions: 4.1.3
            Reporter: Paul Leacu
            Assignee: Paul Leacu


       I've received two potentially contradictory BZs ([1], [2]) and there's been recent discussion
   involving the JBDSIS 7.0.0.Beta4 category names.  This would affect both equinox/p2 and JBoss
   Central mylyn/discovery labelling.  The issue is the following - currently the p2 installer presents
   the user with this:

      > JBoss Business Process and Rules development
      > JBoss Data Virtualization development
      > JBoss Fuse development
      > JBoss SOA 5.x development
      > JBoss SOA development

   The site category name definitions are inconsistent because there's a mixture of product names and
   abstract concept labelling.  The idea was to have FuseSource users and legacy 5.x SOA users have
   an easy time finding what they needed to install and a general user could figure out what they wanted
   by the abstract concept label.  These are expandable categories - if the user wants to know what their
   getting they can expand the category.

   BZ [1] suggests changing the following:

   Option [A]:
      > JBoss Business Process and Rules development
      > JBoss Data Virtualization development
      > JBoss Fuse development
      > JBoss SOA 5.x development
      > JBoss Fuse Service Works

   That clearly leaves us with 2 "Fuse" categories, one of which doesn't contain the Fuse features, and
   expands on the product name based category labelling.  If you're installing 'Fuse Service Works' it
   could be argued that you'd expect to find that as a choice.

   Alan made an interesting suggestion to combine SOA and Fuse, keeping the abstract labelling and
   resulting in the following:

   Option [B]:
      > JBoss Business Process and Rules development
      > JBoss Data Virtualization development
      > JBoss Integration development
      > JBoss SOA 5.x development

   That leaves the 'SOA 5.x' category as an outlier.  Acceptable?  Would something like this be better?

   Option [C]:
      > JBoss Business Process and Rules development
      > JBoss Data Virtualization development
      > JBoss Integration development
      > JBoss Legacy Integration development
 
   Applying the combine Fuse algorithm to [A] you could also have this:
 
   Option [D]:
      > JBoss Business Process and Rules development
      > JBoss Data Virtualization development
      > JBoss Fuse Service Works
      > JBoss SOA 5.x development

   So - we're post-beta and I'm happy to accommodate the consensus - WDYT?

   Thanks,
              --paull

   [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021282
   [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021283



--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira