[jbosstools-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-18053) Add Powermock to the target platform

[Jeff Cantrill (JIRA)]

    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18053?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12991195#comment-12991195 ] 

Jeff Cantrill commented on JBIDE-18053:
---------------------------------------

[~nickboldt]  I think it depends on what is currently be used in the code base.  Do we have any unit tests that utilize 'testng'?  Do we have any unit tests that utilize easymock?  It is my opinion for uniformity across the code base we should promote one or the other and limit the feature group.  The alternative is to add them since it doesn't 'cost' us anything right?

> Add Powermock to the target platform
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JBIDE-18053
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18053
>             Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
>          Issue Type: Feature Request
>          Components: build
>    Affects Versions: 4.2.x
>            Reporter: Jeff Cantrill
>            Assignee: Nick Boldt
>             Fix For: 4.2.0.CR1
>
>
> Reason:  To improving testing by allowing the stubbing of scenerios like "new File(path).exists()" which require bytecode modifications in order to accomplish.  Example of intended use: https://gist.github.com/jcantrill/fd83c27d3fc542742ec7
>   License and owner:  Apache 2.0 / https://github.com/jayway
>   Original repo: https://github.com/jayway/powermock
>   JBoss mirror: Unknown
>   Sources: Unknown
>   Affected projects:
>   Include in JBDS: *No*
>   Type of dependency: testing
>   List of bundles added/removed:
> {code}
> + <unit id="org.powermock.mockito-junit.feature.feature.group" version="1.5.4.1"/>
> + <unit id="org.objenesis" version="2.1.0"/>
> + <unit id="javassist" version="3.18.1.GA"/>
> {code}
>   If applicable:
>     non-p2 repository:
>     non-p2 ids:



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.6#6264)