[jbosstools-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-16367) Drop sourceforge.net archiving?

[Nick Boldt (JIRA)]

    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-16367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12936010#comment-12936010 ] 

Nick Boldt commented on JBIDE-16367:
------------------------------------

Yes, 400+ downloads of update site zips (and other files) per week.

http://sourceforge.net/projects/jboss/files/JBossTools/JBossTools4.1.x/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/jboss/files/JBossTools/JBossTools4.0.x/

These are linked from here:

http://www.jboss.org/tools/download/stable/4_1
http://www.jboss.org/tools/download/stable/4_0

We've been using SF since the early days in 2007. Curiously, we're still getting downloads of stuff from JBT 3.0 (2009) at a rate of 8 update site zips/week. 

http://sourceforge.net/projects/jboss/files/JBossTools/JBossTools3.0.x/

And JBT 3.3.2 is still getting 60 dls/week:

http://sourceforge.net/projects/jboss/files/JBossTools/JBossTools3.3.x/



                
> Drop sourceforge.net archiving?
> -------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JBIDE-16367
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-16367
>             Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
>          Issue Type: Feature Request
>          Components: build
>            Reporter: Mickael Istria
>             Fix For: 4.2.x
>
>
> We currently do archive stuff on sf.net. This adds an extra piece in build process and infrastructure, which does not seem to provide additional value upon keeping binaries on download.jboss.org.
> I'd be in favour of abandoning sf.net to find something which is more comfortable for us to use (download.jboss.org is IMO the best candidate).

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira