[jbosstools-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (JBDS-3071) JBDS Installer shouldn't contain source features/plugins

[Nick Boldt (JIRA)]

    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12977379#comment-12977379 ] 

Nick Boldt commented on JBDS-3071:
----------------------------------

{quote}Nick, PR you submitted would build just p2repo with features without product metadata and cannot be used in installer.{quote}

Not true. The only difference between site/ and site-no-sources/ is that one excludes sources from the category.xml. BOTH include the product:

https://github.com/nickboldt/jbdevstudio-product/blob/JBDS-3071/site-no-sources/pom.xml#L39

> JBDS Installer shouldn't contain source features/plugins
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JBDS-3071
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3071
>             Project: Developer Studio (JBoss Developer Studio)
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) 
>          Components: installer
>    Affects Versions: 8.0.0.Beta2
>            Reporter: Fred Bricon
>            Assignee: Nick Boldt
>             Fix For: 8.0.0.Beta3
>
>
> {quote}
> So the basic JBDS installer is 70MB fatter. From my understanding it's because we now ship a *huge* forge2 runtime (50MB), Tern, the JVM Monitor and probably some other minor stuff.
> Fair enough. But do we *really* need to add all the source features/plugins to the installer? *If* we're legally bound to provide sources for JBoss plugins, couldn't we provide them via an other way? (p2 only).
> I reckon we could save ~37 MB by not shipping sources in the installer. I know storage is cheap and d/l speeds are faster but that's not an excuse.
> {quote}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.6#6264)