[jbosstools-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-18662) use getProjectSHAs.sh to control when to run aggregate builds, instead of doing composite site installs

Mickael Istria (JIRA) issues at jboss.org
Wed Nov 19 06:17:39 EST 2014


    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13021086#comment-13021086 ] 

Mickael Istria commented on JBIDE-18662:
----------------------------------------

The use-case of this report seems to be "included" in the changes and discussions related to JBIDE-18742. Will close as DUPLICATE.

> use getProjectSHAs.sh to control when to run aggregate builds, instead of doing composite site installs
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JBIDE-18662
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18662
>             Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: build
>    Affects Versions: 4.2.0.CR2
>            Reporter: Nick Boldt
>            Assignee: Nick Boldt
>             Fix For: 4.2.1.Final, 4.3.0.Alpha1
>
>
> Nick said:
> >> How else would you determine if/when the aggregates should be built? 
> >> Using a variation on getProjectSHAs.sh script and diffing the last run 
> >> w/ the current run? Or something else?
> And Mickael replied:
> > It could be built as often as the composite-install job runs because it 
> > takes more or less the same time, and even if one builds aggregator for 
> > nothing, it won't change the aggregate repository output (only the 
> > content.jar and artifact.jar would be updated to a newer timestamp).
> > So since it's totally possible directly aggregate whenever something 
> > changes for the same price, it seems more straightforward to do it 
> > instead of introducing an intermediary control job, which can have bugs.
> Then Nick said:
> Yeah, I still like the fact that the composite install job performs an install test... but maybe it can be downstream of the TP change and NOT upstream of the aggregate builds?
> I could look at creating a more "diffable digest" as output of getProjectSHAs.sh and have that run in Jenkins as the gatekeeper (or keymaster?) for when to run aggregates.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.8#6338)


More information about the jbosstools-issues mailing list