[jbosstools-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-22255) Number of alterated OpenShift 3 Server Adapter should start from 2 not 1

[Fred Bricon (JIRA)]

    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-22255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13198020#comment-13198020 ] 

Fred Bricon edited comment on JBIDE-22255 at 4/27/16 1:13 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------

Seems like eventually, OpenShift delegates to https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-server/blob/master/as/plugins/org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core/jbosscore/org/jboss/ide/eclipse/as/core/util/ServerNamingUtility.java#L35, so that should be a Server issue. cc [~rob.stryker].

The problem can be reproduced with regular JBoss servers


was (Author: fbricon):
Seems like eventually, OpenShift delegates to https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-server/blob/master/as/plugins/org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core/jbosscore/org/jboss/ide/eclipse/as/core/util/ServerNamingUtility.java#L35, so that should be a Server issue. cc [~rob.stryker].

> Number of alterated OpenShift 3 Server Adapter should start from 2 not 1
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JBIDE-22255
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-22255
>             Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: openshift
>    Affects Versions: 4.4.0.Alpha1
>            Reporter: Marián Labuda
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: openshift_v3, server, ux
>             Fix For: 4.4.x
>
>
> When I create a New OpenShift 3 Server Adapter with same details as already an existing one server adapter, new one has altered label in Server view by number in parentheses. This starts with number 1. 
> Example:
> I am having an OS 3 Server Adapter with label "eap-app at OpenShift 3 (10.1.2.2)" then I create a new OS 3 Server Adapter with same details and I get "eap-app at OpenShift 3 (10.1.2.2) (1)", what I think is not correct, because it is already second.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)