[jbosstools-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (JBDS-3557) JBDS Installer should be EPL licensed

Nick Boldt (JIRA) issues at jboss.org
Thu Jan 14 10:14:01 EST 2016


    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3557?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13148855#comment-13148855 ] 

Nick Boldt commented on JBDS-3557:
----------------------------------

If ASLv2 is acceptable as a compatible license to EPL, then I would think we don't have to relicense the izpack stuff.

If ASLv2 and LGPL in the installer's *output* is acceptable (but GPL is *unacceptable*) then we have to change the licenses in central/plugins/org.jboss.tools.central.themes -- multi-licensed somehow under EPL, *GPL*, LGPL, Apache v2 and BSD! -- but probably the rest of JBT is OK. I'll look for more examples of *GPL* code. 

My only question here remains: if it's OK to ship a bundle (installer jar) which is created/distributed under EPL, how is it OK to include software inside that bundle which is under a DIFFERENT license? Seems a bit bait-and-switch to me... you accept EPL for the installer, but then suddenly you've got differently-licensed code on disk. [~fontana] ?

> JBDS Installer should be EPL licensed
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JBDS-3557
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3557
>             Project: Developer Studio (JBoss Developer Studio)
>          Issue Type: Enhancement
>          Components: installer, legal
>            Reporter: Ken Finnigan
>            Assignee: Nick Boldt
>             Fix For: 9.1.0.Beta2, 10.0.0.Alpha1
>
>
> For the Developer Platform to be able to bundle JBDS, it needs to be licensed as ASLv2 or EPL and not GPL



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)


More information about the jbosstools-issues mailing list