[jbosstools-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-22472) Improve UI of per-module zip settings
Martin Malina (JIRA)
issues at jboss.org
Tue Jul 19 10:17:00 EDT 2016
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-22472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Martin Malina closed JBIDE-22472.
---------------------------------
Verified in devstudio 10.0.1.AM2 B5663
> Improve UI of per-module zip settings
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-22472
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-22472
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: server
> Affects Versions: 4.4.0.Final
> Reporter: Martin Malina
> Assignee: Rob Stryker
> Fix For: 4.4.1.AM1
>
>
> This is a follow up of JBIDE-22157 and JBIDE-20577.
> When you were implementing JBIDE-22157, you asked me for feedback which I gave you but there was no further reply from you:
> https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-server/pull/412
> {quote}
> what happens if I select to zip all? the new column does not apply then? it would be good to make this obvious somehow.
> also, could it be a checkbox instead of false/true?
> {quote}
> 1) Could we have checkboxes instead of true/false?
> 2) On a new server adapter, a "false" actually means "see default above" - once you change the default to compress all, each "false" will change to "true". But once you change a module to true and then back to false, changing the default will no longer affect the module settings anymore. This is counter intuitive.
> So what would make more sense in my opinion is to have checkboxes for each module and then perhaps a link called "all" at the column header? And get rid of the default settings? What do you think?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
More information about the jbosstools-issues
mailing list