[jbosstools-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-22619) Decide strategy for fixversion targets in JIRA

[Max Rydahl Andersen (JIRA)]

    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-22619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13255412#comment-13255412 ] 

Max Rydahl Andersen commented on JBIDE-22619:
---------------------------------------------

Yes, so I'm not seeing any suggested valid reason for using sprint numbers in versions. I'm seeing reasons for considering how we handle how fixversion is set (i.e. it might not be required to set as early as we did in past)

And no,  I did not see any agreement on changing this in hipchat. And even if we did this kind of change should be sent to jbosstools-dev *before* a change is made, not *after*.

> Decide strategy for fixversion targets in JIRA
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JBIDE-22619
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-22619
>             Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: build
>    Affects Versions: 4.4.1.S116
>            Reporter: Nick Boldt
>            Assignee: Alexey Kazakov
>             Fix For: 4.4.1.S116
>
>
> We need to decide the strategy for milestones / fixversions in JIRA.
> One suggestion has been to align fixversions w/ sprint numbers, thus:
> * 4.4.1.S116, 4.4.1.S117, 4.4.1.S118, 4.4.1.S119, ...?
> instead of 
> * 4.4.1.Alpha1, 4.4.1.Alpha2, 4.4.1.Alpha3, 4.4.1.Beta1, ... ?
> Questions/concerns:
> * what do we do for unscheduled milestones (4.5.0.Alpha1, 11.0.0.Alpha1) and placeholders (4.4.1.Final, 10.0.1.GA) ? Should we just use Alpha1 or Final/GA until we know which sprint applies?
> * whatever schema we adopt has to work with bzira and jiralint
> * any other systems that parse JIRA for integration purposes?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)