[jbosstools-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (JBTIS-199) Update category names for installer.

[Andrej Podhradsky (JIRA)]

     [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTIS-199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Andrej Podhradsky closed JBTIS-199.
-----------------------------------


Verified with JBDS-IS 7.1.0.GA

> Update category names for installer.
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JBTIS-199
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTIS-199
>             Project: JBoss Tools Integration Stack
>          Issue Type: Task
>    Affects Versions: 4.0.0
>            Reporter: Paul Leacu
>            Assignee: Paul Leacu
>             Fix For: 4.1.3.Final
>
>
>        I've received two potentially contradictory BZs ([1], [2]) and there's been recent discussion
>    involving the JBDSIS 7.0.0.Beta4 category names.  This would affect both equinox/p2 and JBoss
>    Central mylyn/discovery labelling.  The issue is the following - currently the p2 installer presents
>    the user with this:
>       > JBoss Business Process and Rules development
>       > JBoss Data Virtualization development
>       > JBoss Fuse development
>       > JBoss SOA 5.x development
>       > JBoss SOA development
>    The site category name definitions are inconsistent because there's a mixture of product names and
>    abstract concept labelling.  The idea was to have FuseSource users and legacy 5.x SOA users have
>    an easy time finding what they needed to install and a general user could figure out what they wanted
>    by the abstract concept label.  These are expandable categories - if the user wants to know what their
>    getting they can expand the category.
>    BZ [1] suggests changing the following:
>    Option [A]:
>       > JBoss Business Process and Rules development
>       > JBoss Data Virtualization development
>       > JBoss Fuse development
>       > JBoss SOA 5.x development
>       > JBoss Fuse Service Works
>    That clearly leaves us with 2 "Fuse" categories, one of which doesn't contain the Fuse features, and
>    expands on the product name based category labelling.  If you're installing 'Fuse Service Works' it
>    could be argued that you'd expect to find that as a choice.
>    Alan made an interesting suggestion to combine SOA and Fuse, keeping the abstract labelling and
>    resulting in the following:
>    Option [B]:
>       > JBoss Business Process and Rules development
>       > JBoss Data Virtualization development
>       > JBoss Integration development
>       > JBoss SOA 5.x development
>    That leaves the 'SOA 5.x' category as an outlier.  Acceptable?  Would something like this be better?
>    Option [C]:
>       > JBoss Business Process and Rules development
>       > JBoss Data Virtualization development
>       > JBoss Integration development
>       > JBoss Legacy Integration development
>  
>    Applying the combine Fuse algorithm to [A] you could also have this:
>  
>    Option [D]:
>       > JBoss Business Process and Rules development
>       > JBoss Data Virtualization development
>       > JBoss Fuse Service Works
>       > JBoss SOA 5.x development
>    So - we're post-beta and I'm happy to accommodate the consensus - WDYT?
>    Thanks,
>               --paull
>    [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021282
>    [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021283



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)