[jbossts-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (JBTM-2299) Why does Blacktie have its own CosTransactions.idl?

Amos Feng (JIRA) issues at jboss.org
Mon Nov 24 09:55:39 EST 2014

    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTM-2299?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13022403#comment-13022403 ] 

Amos Feng commented on JBTM-2299:

It looks like we don't need it as we has removed the TAO dependency in JBTM-1665 and used the http rest methods to access the TM
[~tomjenkinson], Does it make sense ?

> Why does Blacktie have its own CosTransactions.idl?
> ---------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: JBTM-2299
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTM-2299
>             Project: JBoss Transaction Manager
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: BlackTie
>    Affects Versions: 5.0.3
>            Reporter: Mark Little
>            Assignee: Amos Feng
> Shouldn't it use the one in ArjunaJTS?

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

More information about the jbossts-issues mailing list