[jbossts-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (JBTM-2299) Why does Blacktie have its own CosTransactions.idl?
Amos Feng (JIRA)
issues at jboss.org
Mon Nov 24 09:55:39 EST 2014
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTM-2299?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13022403#comment-13022403 ]
Amos Feng commented on JBTM-2299:
---------------------------------
It looks like we don't need it as we has removed the TAO dependency in JBTM-1665 and used the http rest methods to access the TM
[~tomjenkinson], Does it make sense ?
> Why does Blacktie have its own CosTransactions.idl?
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBTM-2299
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTM-2299
> Project: JBoss Transaction Manager
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: BlackTie
> Affects Versions: 5.0.3
> Reporter: Mark Little
> Assignee: Amos Feng
>
> Shouldn't it use the one in ArjunaJTS?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.8#6338)
More information about the jbossts-issues
mailing list