[jbossws-dev] Re: jax-ws client artifacts: wsimport or not?

[Heiko Braun]

Wow. I didn't know that. 

To me it was the most natural way to do things.

 

;)

 

 

________________________________

From: Jason T. Greene 
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 4:26 PM
To: Burr Sutter; Thomas Diesler; Heiko Braun
Cc: jbossws-dev at lists.jboss.org
Subject: RE: [jbossws-dev] Re: jax-ws client artifacts: wsimport or not?

 

With JAX-WS, the point you have about java2wsdl is only true on our
container ;)

 

All other containers require you to generate additional source code that
has to be bundled with the deployment. We generate the bytecode
dynamically at deploy time.

 

-Jason

 

________________________________

From: jbossws-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org
[mailto:jbossws-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Burr Sutter
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 9:22 AM
To: Thomas Diesler; Heiko Braun
Cc: jbossws-dev at lists.jboss.org
Subject: RE: [jbossws-dev] Re: jax-ws client artifacts: wsimport or not?

 

I'm not sure if you want my 2 cents but option #1 makes for the best
demo though many audience members would like to see the wsdl2java
(contract first) method as well. I normally don't show this but I do
need to add it.  

 

Java2wsdl from the command is only for those folks wishing to integrate
the WS development into their automated build scripts/unit testing.  

 

 

________________________________

From: jbossws-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org
[mailto:jbossws-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Diesler
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 10:10 AM
To: Heiko Braun
Cc: jbossws-dev at lists.jboss.org
Subject: Re: [jbossws-dev] Re: jax-ws client artifacts: wsimport or not?

 

ok, lets do #1

Heiko Braun wrote: 

>From my point of view #1 is perfectly fine, at least for the JBW demos.

People wont realize it, since I start with an JSR181-EJB3 first and the
pickup the WSDL from there.

 

/Heiko

 

________________________________

From: Thomas Diesler [mailto:thomas.diesler at redhat.com] 
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 3:59 PM
To: Jason T. Greene
Cc: Heiko Braun; jbossws-dev at lists.jboss.org
Subject: Re: [jbossws-dev] Re: jax-ws client artifacts: wsimport or not?

 

This shows how badly broken the integration is. If we can do it in
container, why can this not be done offline?

So what should the message be for java2wsdl?

#1 deploy to server, pickup the wsdl from the browser
#2 use wsgen

I'd opt for #1 otherwise we have people generating conflicting
contracts.

cheers
-thomas


Jason T. Greene wrote: 

We don't yet have an offline tool for java2wsdl.
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBWS-1043
 
Last we discussed this task was delayed until the following were
completed:
- CTS compliance
- Backporting to jbossws-1.0
 
-Jason
  

	-----Original Message-----
	From: jbossws-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org [mailto:jbossws-dev-
	bounces at lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Diesler
	Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 8:35 AM
	To: Heiko Braun
	Cc: jbossws-dev at lists.jboss.org
	Subject: [jbossws-dev] Re: jax-ws client artifacts: wsimport or
not?
	 
	For java2wsdl use our tools.
	For wsdl2java use wsimport and monitor
	http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBWS-1042
	 
	-thomas
	 
	Heiko Braun wrote:
	    

		What's the (communication) strategy for jax-ws tools?
		Are we going to point people to the RI tools until we
are ready?
		What should be communicated at JBW?
		 
		I am currently hacking the demo and don't know if I
should hide the
		      

RI
  

		or not...
		 
		/Heiko
		 
		--
		Heiko Braun
		JBoss, a division of Red Hat
		T: +49 89 52350383
		M: +49 178 1496854
		 
		 
		      

	--
	xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
	Thomas Diesler
	Web Service Lead
	JBoss, a division of Red Hat
	xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
	 
	_______________________________________________
	jbossws-dev mailing list
	jbossws-dev at lists.jboss.org
	https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossws-dev
	    

 

-- 
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thomas Diesler
Web Service Lead
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

-- 
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thomas Diesler
Web Service Lead
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.14.0/524 - Release Date:
11/8/2006


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbossws-dev/attachments/20061109/b667c792/attachment.html