[jbossws-dev] To SH or not to SH

[Jason T. Greene]

Ok I am mostly convinced, although ant doesn't use ".sh"

On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 23:32 -0600, Alejandro Guízar wrote:
> Ant and countless other software uses .sh as well. When you see the .sh 
> extension you immediately knows what the contents of the file are. The 
> same does not apply to a file without extension.
> 
> I'd go for keeping .sh.
> 
> -Alejandro
> 
> Jason T. Greene wrote:
> > Hi Thomas,
> > 
> > I was planning on dropping the sh extension for JAX-WS tools. The reason
> > is so that the same command works for all platforms. This works since on
> > windows you don't need to type the .bat extension to execute the script.
> > However everything else in jboss uses .sh, and the old tools use .sh. So
> > perhaps it's bad to break convention.
> > 
> > How do you want to do this?
> > 
> > -Jason
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > jbossws-dev mailing list
> > jbossws-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossws-dev