[jbossws-dev] Fw: [ws-rx] WS-ReliableMessaging 1.1 Submitted for OASIS Standard

Heiko Braun hbraun at redhat.com
Tue May 15 06:53:50 EDT 2007



Begin forwarded message:

Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 09:33:55 -0400
From: "Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae at oasis-open.org>
To: <members at lists.oasis-open.org>, <tc-announce at lists.oasis-open.org>
Cc: <ws-rx at lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject: [ws-rx] WS-ReliableMessaging 1.1 Submitted for OASIS Standard


OASIS Members:

The OASIS Web Services Reliable Exchange (WS-RX) Technical Committee
has submitted the following specification, which is an approved
Committee Specification, to be considered as an OASIS Standard:

WS-ReliableMessaging 1.1:
- Web Services ReliableMessaging 1.1 
- Web Services ReliableMessaging Policy 1.1 
- Web Services MakeConnection 1.0 

The text of the TC submission is appended.

You now have until 15 May to familiarize yourself with the submission
and provide input to your organization's voting representative.

On 16 May, a Call For Vote will be issued to all Voting Representatives
of OASIS member organizations. They will have until the last day of
May, inclusive, to cast their ballots on whether this Committee
Specification should be approved as an OASIS Standard or not.

Members who wish to discuss this ballot may do so through
member-discuss at lists.oasis-open.org.

In accordance with the OASIS Technical Committee Process, this
Committee Specification has already completed the necessary 60-day
public review period as noted in the submission below.

The normative TC Process for approval of Committee Specifications as
OASIS Standards is found at
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.php#3.4

Any statements related to the IPR of this specification are posted at:
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ws-rx/ipr.php

Your participation in the review and balloting process is greatly
appreciated.

Mary

Mary P McRae
Manager of TC Administration, OASIS
email: mary.mcrae at oasis-open.org
phone: 603.232.9090

-----------------------
(a) Links to the approved Committee Specification in the TC's document 
repository, and any appropriate supplemental documentation for the 
specification, both of which must be written using the OASIS templates. 
The specification may not have been changed between its approval as a 
Committee Specification and its submission to OASIS for consideration
as an OASIS Standard, except for the changes on the title page and
running footer noting the approval status and date. 

Web Services ReliableMessaging 1.1 
PDF -
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200702/wsrm-1.1-spec-cs-01.pdf
HTML -
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200702/wsrm-1.1-spec-cs-01.html
Schema -
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200702/wsrm-1.1-schema-200702.xsd
WSDL -
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200702/wsrm-1.1-wsdl-200702.wsdl
Namespace -
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200702/wsrm-1.1-rddl-200702.html 

Web Services ReliableMessaging Policy 1.1 
PDF -
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrmp/200702/wsrmp-1.1-spec-cs-01.pdf
HTML -
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrmp/200702/wsrmp-1.1-spec-cs-01.html
Schema -
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrmp/200702/wsrmp-1.1-schema-200702.xsd
Namespace -
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrmp/200702/wsrmp-1.1-rddl-200702.html 

Web Services MakeConnection 1.0 
PDF -
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsmc/200702/wsmc-1.0-spec-cs-01.pdf
HTML -
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsmc/200702/wsmc-1.0-spec-cs-01.html
Schema -
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsmc/200702/wsmc-1.0-schema-200702.xsd
WSDL -
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsmc/200702/wsmc-1.0-wsdl-200702.wsdl
Namespace -
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsmc/200702/wsmc-1.0-rddl-200702.html 

(b) The editable version of all files that are part of the Committee 
Specification; 

http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200702/wsrm-1.1-spec-cs-01.doc 
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrmp/200702/wsrmp-1.1-spec-cs-01.doc 
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsmc/200702/wsmc-1.0-spec-cs-01.doc 

(c) Certification by the TC that all schema and XML instances included 
in the specification, whether by inclusion or reference, including 
fragments of such, are well formed, and that all expressions are valid; 

All schema and XML instances included in the specification are well 
formed and all expressions are valid. 

(d) A clear English-language summary of the specification; 

The WS-ReliableMessaging 1.1 specification consists of multiple parts. 

The core WS-ReliableMessaging 1.1 document defines a protocol for 
reliable message exchange between two Web services, even in the
presence of network or system failures. For example, the protocol can
ensure the resending of messages that have been lost, and can ensure
that duplicate messages are not delivered. The protocol allows Web
service nodes to implement a variety of delivery assurances, including
At Most Once, At Least Once, Exactly Once and In Order delivery of
messages. The protocol fundamentally defines a one-way reliable channel
(known as a Sequence), but also includes mechanisms to optimize the
creation of two-way reliable exchanges. The protocol is designed to
compose with other relevant standards such as WS-Security and
WS-SecureConversation. The protocol allows developers to add reliable
delivery of messages to their applications on a variety of platforms,
including Java and .NET. 

The WS-ReliableMessaging Policy 1.1 document defines an XML policy 
language that enables Web services to advertise their support for the 
WS-ReliableMessaging specification. The specification is designed for 
use with the WS-Policy Framework. The language aids the
interoperability of nodes that support WS-ReliableMessaging by
publishing their support and requirements for aspects of reliable
messaging. For example, an endpoint may use this specification to
indicate that it requires that the reliable message protocol to be
secured using transport level security. WS-ReliableMessaging Policy is
designed to be used with other policy languages, such as WS-Security
Policy, in the scope of the WS-Policy Framework. 

The WS-MakeConnection 1.0 document defines a protocol that can be 
used to allow two-way communications when only a transport specific 
back-channel (such as the HTTP response mechanism) is available. For 
example, this allows a client to establish a two-way reliable 
message exchange even in the presence of firewalls and network address 
translation, that otherwise would prevent the server from initiating 
connections to the client. 

(e) A statement regarding the relationship of this specification to 
similar work of other OASIS TCs or other standards developing
organizations; 

-- The OASIS WS-Reliable Messaging (WSRM) TC also defines a reliable 
messaging specification for Web services. The WS-RX TC and 
WS-ReliableMessaging specification focuses on creating a specification 
that works in conjunction with and composes with other specifications, 
in particular the WS-Addressing, WS-Security and WS-SecureConversation, 
and WS-Policy Framework specifications. 

(f) Certification by at least three OASIS member organizations that
they are successfully using the specification; 

Certification via email: 
WSO2: 
http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200702/msg00068.html 

IBM: 
http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200702/msg00069.html 

SAP AG:
http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200703/msg00000.html 

(g) The beginning and ending dates of the public review(s), a pointer
to the announcement of the public review(s), and a pointer to an
account of each of the comments/issues raised during the public review
period(s), along with its resolution; 

First Public Review: 24 August 2006 to 21 October 2006 
Second Public Review: 12 February 2007 to 27 February 2007 

Announcement of the first Public Review: 
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tc-announce/200608/msg00005.html 

Announcement of the second Public Review: 
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tc-announce/200702/msg00004.html 

Public Review Issue and Resolution Log: 
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/pr/Issues.xml 

(h) An account of and results of the voting to approve the
specification as a Committee Specification, including the date of the
ballot and a pointer to the ballot; 

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ballot.php?id=1266

(i) An account of or pointer to votes and comments received in any 
earlier attempts to standardize substantially the same specification, 
together with the originating TC's response to each comment; 

This is the first submission to the OASIS membership 

(j) A pointer to the publicly visible comments archive for the 
originating TC; 

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx-comment/ 

(k) A pointer to any minority reports submitted by one or more Members 
who did not vote in favor of approving the Committee Specification, 
which report may include statements regarding why the member voted 
against the specification or that the member believes that Substantive 
Changes were made which have not gone through public review; or 
certification by the Chair that no minority reports exist. 

There are no minority reports. 




More information about the jbossws-dev mailing list