[jbossws-dev] JBossWS SPI 1.1
Heiko Braun
hbraun at redhat.com
Wed Jan 16 14:08:19 EST 2008
Can you verify if container or stack integration code depends on this
signature? If it's just the stack integration, then we can argue about
it. But I think that this general rule should apply to any changes.
/Heiko
On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 17:01 +0100, Richard Opalka wrote:
> Hi Heiko,
>
> I did one incompatible change to the SPI, but Thomas told me that it
> is OK, because only we are consumers of our SPI.
> If it isn't OK, let me know and I'll return removed method and deprecate it.
>
> See: http://fisheye.jboss.com/changelog/JBossWS/spi/trunk?cs=5245
>
> Richard
>
> Heiko Braun wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > can anyone who did changes to the SPI verify that they
> > are backwards compatible? This means only additions to the SPI
> > are ok. If you remove, rename or modify existing signatures you need to
> > deprecate for the next release and clearly communicate it so that we can
> > do an according release number in a subsequent release.
> >
> >
> > Thanks, Heiko
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > jbossws-dev mailing list
> > jbossws-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossws-dev
> >
>
>
More information about the jbossws-dev
mailing list