[jbossws-dev] [Fwd: Re: TCK5 status (06/20)]

[Heiko Braun]

See
http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/tck5-jaxws/146/testReport/unknownTestSuite.0/packageTests/com.sun.ts.tests.jaxws.api.javax_xml_ws.Response/

On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 08:59 -0700, Scott Stark wrote:
> Any direction on this? I want to get past this issue today without
> having to spend too much time digging into the details of the tck test
> harness.
> 
> -------- Original Message -------- 
>                           Subject: 
> Re: TCK5 status (06/20)
>                              Date: 
> Sun, 22 Jun 2008 18:49:04 -0700
>                              From: 
> Scott Stark <sstark at redhat.com>
>                                To: 
> Rajesh Rajasekaran
> <rrajasek at redhat.com>
>                                CC: 
> JavaEE-TCK <javaeetck at jboss.org>
>                        References: 
> <1213949201.3626.4.camel at nymph.grauwnet.nerdnet.nl> <485B6D93.20505 at redhat.com> <1213951820.10747.10.camel at localhost.localdomain> <485B71E4.9080209 at redhat.com> <485BBF63.8010009 at redhat.com>
> 
> 
> I have assigned JBCTS-814 back to Heiko as I don't see how the 
> getSharedObject() value the client is using to obtain the service 
> relates to anything we are setting up in the client. This test does not 
> use injection, and the client env has a binding for the service, so let 
> me know how this is supposed to propagate to the test service field.
> 
> Rajesh Rajasekaran wrote:
> > Overall: 93.95%
> > 4.38% increase from last week
> >
> > Modules at 100%
> > interop-integration, interop-naming, interop-rmiiiop, 
> > interop-security, interop-tx, interop-csiv2, saaj
> >
> > ejb3-core - (74% - back to and better than Beta4 results)
> > However down from the 78% yesterday (Blocker), due to changes put in 
> > for JBCTS-540, Carlo investigating, follow up on separate thread.
> >
> > ejb3-persistence - At 99%, up 7% from last week - outstanding issues 
> > on spreadsheet
> >
> > Blockers:
> > (Affecting webservices, webservices12, jws, jaxws, jaxrpc, 
> > interop-webservices)
> > http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCTS-814
> > http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCTS-813
> >
> > The spreadsheet has been updated to reflect the latest outstanding 
> > JIRA's.
> >
> > Modules certified: 24
> > Modules remaining : 13
> >
> > Detailed results:
> > https://svn.corp.jboss.com/repos/tck/reports/weekly/TCK5-JBossAS5.0.0.GA.xls 
> >
> > http://intranet.corp.redhat.com/ic/intranet/CTS50TestResults.html
> >
> > Adding comments from Dimitris which summarizes the status.
> >
> >
> > Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
> >> The best TCK results we've got with Beta4 had:
> >>
> >> assembly          - 7 failures
> >> ejb               - 4 failures
> >> ejb30+persistence - 313 failures
> >> jacc              - 2 failures
> >> servlet           - 2 failures
> >> signature         - 4 failures
> >>                  --------------
> >>                    332
> >>
> >> So we need to get rid of:
> >>
> >> appclient           - 3 failures
> >> jaxrpc              - 245 failures
> >> jaxws               - 709  failures
> >> (servlet)           - 10 failures
> >> webservices         - 156 failures
> >> jws                 - 101 failures
> >> webservices12       - 61 failures
> >> interop-webservices - 67 failures
> >>                    ----------------
> >>                      1352 failures
> >>
> >> Or more or less all the webservice (+appclient +couple of servlet 
> >> ones) regression.
> >>                                                                     
> >>                                                                     
> >>                                                                     
> >>                                                                     
> >>                                                             My read 
> >> of the last 2 TCK runs is that:
> >>
> >> We got significant (+3.5%) improvement from:
> >> - Ales' VFS fix
> >> - Stefan's stubs resolution
> >> - Rejesh descriptor fixes
> >> - JBossXB update
> >> - ... other changes I forget
> >>
> >> We got sidetracked (-0.5%) by
> >> - the JBCTS-540 (+metadata org.jboss.metadata.jbmeta11) hack, that 
> >> probably conflicts with Scott's "change the LegacyEjb3JndiPolicy ejb3 
> >> REMOTE_HOME to ejbName/home from baseJndiName+"Home"
> >>
> >> And the upgrade to ejb3-core 0.1.5 was not performed as yet.
> >>
> >> The current pass rate for tck is 93.95%
> >>
> >> Since most of the other release criteria are met (Seam is running, AS 
> >> testsuite in good shape, AS JIRA almost there) I think the EJB3 team 
> >> together with Scott should focus on the JNDI issue resolved *ASAP*.
> >>
> >> Ales is looking at the other VFS issue + profileservice, while 
> >> everyone else keeps closing JBAS/JBCTS tasks or continues with AS 
> >> testsuite improvements.
> >>
> >> If you manage to tackle the JNDI issue and we get a good TCK run, we 
> >> should be able to release early next week.
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> jbossws-dev mailing list
> jbossws-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossws-dev