[jbossws-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBWS-3264) Don't use log4j configuration classes in our CXF tools - identify possible workarounds

[Richard Opalka (JIRA)]

Don't use log4j configuration classes in our CXF tools - identify possible workarounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: JBWS-3264
                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBWS-3264
             Project: JBoss Web Services
          Issue Type: Task
      Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
            Reporter: Richard Opalka
             Fix For:  jbossws-cxf-4.0


<opalka> dmlloyd, I found ugly dependency - http://fpaste.org/9UXj/
<stuartdouglas> opalka: I actually hacked up something last night to try and find those problems 
<opalka> dmlloyd, stuartdouglas this is the call resulting to this dependency - we're using log4j configurators - http://fpaste.org/aKXp/
<dmlloyd> why?
<dmlloyd> (a) you shouldn't do that, (b) to fix the problem add "javax.api" to log4j's module dep
<opalka> dmlloyd, this is question for alessio. I have no idea? Probably Alessio want's to use log4j config facility
<dmlloyd> ok well if we're doing that it's pretty lame because we go through many hoops to avoid using the log4j config facility
<opalka> dmlloyd, method javadoc isn't more descriptive as well - http://fpaste.org/DyVx/ I'll need to ask Alessio
<opalka> dmlloyd, but just to confirm, we don't want org.apache.logging -> org.w3c.dom dependency in AS7, right ?
* opalka don't like this dependency 
<dmlloyd> no, org.apache.logging is something completely different
<dmlloyd> it should be org.apache.log4j -> javax.api
<opalka> dmlloyd, and do we want this dependency ?
<dmlloyd> yeah, it's fine to add
<dmlloyd> but we don't want this manual log4j configuration

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira