[jbpm-dev] Feedback for jBPM5 proposal
Sebastian Schneider
schneider at dvz.fh-aachen.de
Fri Apr 16 13:09:02 EDT 2010
Hello everybody,
as requested by Kris I am reposting my feedback on the mailing list:
1.) Will jBPM 5.0 be based upon jBPM 4.x? You mention the PVM and the
native BPMN 2.0-implementation. So I assume it will be. Am I right?
2.) What's the reason for replacing the task management with WS-Human
Task? The task life cycle model? Will this be implemented as a
webservice as most of the other vendors do or will you supply a java
implementation using the same model? You are stating that the engine
will continue to be embeddable so I hope this will be a java
implementation of the task life cycle model.
3.) Will JBoss ESB be an optional component? I am thinking of
embeddability again. Why use an ESB when you don't need one? One of the
strengths of jBPM IMHO is the small footprint.
4.) IMHO it's absolutely crucial to fix some really basic issues
concerning jBPM 4.3 and release 4.4. This is important to not lose the
community. There's also a great insecurity about jBPM 4.x. To be more
precise: whether or not you should start a project wiht jBPM 4.3 right
now. Wide usage by the community is the best test you can get for a
software product.
In general the overall looks nice but there should be priority on the
core engine since all the other components can still be added later on
with no problem.
P.S.: For those who don't know what I am talking about:
https://community.jboss.org/wiki/jBPM5RequestforComments
Cheers and have a nice weekend
Sebastian
--
Sebastian Schneider
e-mail: Sebastian.Schneider at alumni.fh-aachen.de
More information about the jbpm-dev
mailing list