[jbpm-dev] jBPM5 Request for Comments

[Mauricio Salatino]

Talking about Licenses, I hope that jBPM 5 will be licensed using ASL like
Drools Flow right?
I see a lot of customers that prefer ASL over LGPL.
Greetings

On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Sebastian Schneider <
schneider at dvz.fh-aachen.de> wrote:

> Hello folks,
>
> I am not sure if it was mentioned already but it is certainly a point I
> forgot when sending my feedback to the list. One thing I pretty much
> like about jBPM 4.x is its clear and easy-to-understand API. The API is
> pretty well designed and should certainly serve as a template for a
> future one. I don't know anything about the API of Drools Flow. Maybe
> somebody can shed some light on this aspect.
>
> IMHO the API is one of the reasons people on the forums started using
> jBPM 4.x. - because of the API and some other things it gets you started
> a lot quicker. I made the same experience when I started to use jBPM 3.2
> after I have been using jBPM 4.x.
>
> An additional aspect which came to my mind recently is that the process
> engine should be kept DBMS-independent and have a QA-matrix which takes
> into account most of the widespread DB-systems.
>
> With respect to embeddability one could even think of using the JPA to
> enable the usage of compatible object-relational mappers. If I remember
> correctly there have been request or questions on the forum regularly
> about using a different persistence framework than Hibernate.
>
> Cheers
>
> Sebastian
>
> --
> Sebastian Schneider
> e-mail: Sebastian.Schneider at alumni.fh-aachen.de
> _______________________________________________
> jbpm-dev mailing list
> jbpm-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbpm-dev
>



-- 
- http://salaboy.wordpress.com
- http://www.jbug.com.ar
- Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio -
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbpm-dev/attachments/20100426/7aa2030b/attachment-0001.html