[jdf-dev] Rebuilt roadmap
Pete Muir
pmuir at redhat.com
Sat Jul 7 06:34:37 EDT 2012
I've added some text, I'll stage it for the next release when I get network access yet.
On 6 Jul 2012, at 18:06, Marius Bogoevici wrote:
> In the least, I think moving "JBoss Developer Framework is use case focused, and every tri-annual release focuses on two new use cases." to a higher level would increase it's visibility.
> A section on "How do we plan the roadmap" which includes that sentence above + a way of telling people how to provide feedback and solicit new features would be tremendously helpful. IMO.
>
>
> On 2012-07-06, at 12:36 PM, Pete Muir wrote:
>
>> Should I try to write up what I wrote below about the "why" the roadmap is like it is? Is that helpful info?
>>
>> On 6 Jul 2012, at 17:23, Jason Porter wrote:
>>
>>> +1 I like this much more than what we had before. It helps break things up and also shows users and customers what's happening, transparency FTW!
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Pete Muir" <pmuir at redhat.com>
>>>> To: jdf-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> Cc: "Mark Yarborough" <myarboro at redhat.com>
>>>> Sent: Friday, July 6, 2012 9:08:09 AM
>>>> Subject: [jdf-dev] Rebuilt roadmap
>>>>
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>> As your probably aware, one of our goals with jdf is to help people
>>>> understand both the JBoss upstream projects (such as JBoss AS) and
>>>> the Red Hat products (such as JBoss Enterprise Application
>>>> Platform), as they are extremely similar :-)
>>>>
>>>> With this in mind, we've got a fairly strict rule, that we can't add
>>>> something to the jdf roadmap, unless it's also available in a
>>>> product "soon after" the jdf release (i.e. we can develop stuff in
>>>> parallel in jdf, but we shouldn't leap ahead).
>>>>
>>>> As we risk heading into a timing nightmare with this, I feel it is
>>>> simplest that we align the jdf release timeline to the Red Hat
>>>> product which we most closely track (in terms of underlying
>>>> features). This is, obviously, is WFK, where Errai and RichFaces are
>>>> packaged, and DeltaSpike probably will be.
>>>>
>>>> With this in mind, here is the new proposal for the roadmap:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.jboss.org/jdf/stage/about/roadmap/
>>>>
>>>> Note that this covers headline features, and there may well be other
>>>> stuff that makes it in as well, if there is time.
>>>>
>>>> We'll also aim to do some milestone releases:
>>>>
>>>> 10th August: M1
>>>> 17th August: M2
>>>> 24th August: M3
>>>> 31st August: M4
>>>> 7th Sept: M5
>>>> 14th Sept: M6
>>>>
>>>> with a release candidate on 21st Sept.
>>>>
>>>> Marius is working on the Ticket Monster use cases for this release,
>>>> and should have those ready today or early next week.
>>>>
>>>> Please review the above info and let me know what you think,
>>>>
>>>> Pete
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> jdf-dev mailing list
>>>> jdf-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
>>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jdf-dev mailing list
>> jdf-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
>
More information about the jdf-dev
mailing list