[jdf-dev] Looking for a (visual) metaphor

[Marius Bogoevici]

Something based on the JDF logo would be better. I don't think we want to *rate* examples, we just want to indicate their degree of affiliation with jdf. 

On 2012-07-10, at 10:25 AM, Jason Porter wrote:

> What about rendering the jdf "logo" as a stamp? with some specs on it or ink areas missing?
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Pete Muir" <pmuir at redhat.com>
>> To: "Jonathan Fuerth" <jfuerth at redhat.com>
>> Cc: jdf-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 7:53:37 AM
>> Subject: Re: [jdf-dev] Looking for a (visual) metaphor
>> 
>> That could work.
>> 
>> I'll see if I can do some mockups.
>> 
>> On 10 Jul 2012, at 14:50, Jonathan Fuerth wrote:
>> 
>>> A gold starburst "Official Supported JBoss Demo" would convey this
>>> idea to me. Kind of like the Nintendo Seal of Quality.
>>> 
>>> As for the lesser-supported scenarios, I'm not sure we need a mark
>>> for that. The absence of the official seal might be enough.
>>> 
>>> Or, if the supported demos get an Official Seal, maybe the
>>> in-the-works demos could get the industrious Soon-to-be-official
>>> Beaver of Quality, and the unsupported demos could get the
>>> completely unofficial Otter of Quality. (ha, ha, ha.. OK, I'll
>>> stop now.)
>>> 
>>> -Jonathan
>>> 
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Pete Muir" <pmuir at redhat.com>
>>> To: jdf-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 7:08:45 AM
>>> Subject: [jdf-dev] Looking for a (visual) metaphor
>>> 
>>> All,
>>> 
>>> We need a visual metaphor that quickly conveys to people that an
>>> example is:
>>> 
>>> * official, and something we will stand by, answer questions on,
>>> support in a product (e.g. TicketMonster)
>>> * something that we plan to add to as an official example later on
>>> (e.g. jbossworld keynote 2012)
>>> * something that is really interesting, but is unlikely to be
>>> official (e.g. Vineet's example)
>>> 
>>> We had thought about using ski run colours (green circle, blue
>>> square, black diamond) to indicate the level, but they really
>>> refer more to difficulty than to recommendation. Anyone got any
>>> good ideas?
>>> 
>>> Pete
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jdf-dev mailing list
>>> jdf-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> jdf-dev mailing list
>> jdf-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> jdf-dev mailing list
> jdf-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev