[jdf-dev] Full set of Java EE APIs in JBoss spec

[Jason Porter]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Pete Muir" <pmuir at redhat.com>
> To: "Paul Gier" <pgier at redhat.com>
> Cc: jdf-dev at lists.jboss.org, "Shelly McGowan" <smcgowan at redhat.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 12:02:51 PM
> Subject: Re: [jdf-dev] Full set of Java EE APIs in JBoss spec
> 
> 
> On 10 Jul 2012, at 18:45, Paul Gier wrote:
> 
> > Hi Pete,
> > 
> > By missing, do you mean APIs jars that come from thirdparty?  I
> > believe
> > our BOM has all the APIs, there is just a split between the jars
> > built
> > as part of the JBoss specs project vs. built by thirdparties.
> 
> I do indeed.
> 
> > 
> > You can see the split in the specs BOM here:
> > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/jboss/spec/jboss-javaee-6.0/3.0.1.Final/jboss-javaee-6.0-3.0.1.Final.pom
> > 
> > I'm not sure if we'll have time to re-create the remaining
> > thirdparty
> > ones, it's pretty low priority.  What's the problem that they cause
> > currently?
> 
> Jason?

AFAIK there are no problems for the developers. This was first brought up when we started doing DeltaSpike and JBoss didn't have all the APIs so we had to use geromino jars for the API to comply with Apache's IP clearance. I was also thinking of this for the Fedora packaging they're working on. If it's coming from Fedora, why not use jars JBoss/Red Hat creates? Right now they'll probably have to use Geromino jars for the RPMs.

> > 
> > On 07/09/2012 05:17 PM, Pete Muir wrote:
> >> Hey Shelly, Paul,
> >> 
> >> I know we are missing a few of these, and for consistency/one less
> >> FAQ, it would be nice to have a complete set.
> >> 
> >> WDYT? Do you guys have time to "finish this off" over the next
> >> month or two?
> >> 
> >> Pete
> >> 
> > 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> jdf-dev mailing list
> jdf-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
>