[jdf-dev] Archetype BOM version

[Rafael Benevides]

Ok! And I'll need to get notified when WFK 2.2 is released.

You can open a JIra so I update the Archetypes and reply you with the 
new version. ok ?

Thanks.

Em 18/04/13 12:44, Karel Piwko escreveu:
> Works for me. However, I need exact archetype version with upcoming update to
> put it into documentation.
>
> On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 12:39:40 -0300
> Rafael Benevides <benevides at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> So can I merge the PR using 1.0.2.Final-redhat-1 and them when the WFK
>> 2.2 hits maven.repository.redhat.com/techpreview/ we update again the
>> archetypes to match the released WFK 2.2 ?
>>
>> Em 18/04/13 12:31, Karel Piwko escreveu:
>>> With other archetypes in WFK, they are waiting in staging repository, where
>>> QE can validate them using WFK 2.2 zip repository.
>>>
>>> Once WFK 2.2 hits maven.repository.redhat.com/techpreview/, archetypes can
>>> be pushed to release repository, get sync'd to Maven Central and then
>>> stacks.yml updated to contain new version and picked by JBoss Central in
>>> JBDS.
>>>
>>> We should not definitely use WFK 2.1, as groupId changes were wrong there.
>>>
>>> On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 12:20:04 -0300
>>> Rafael Benevides <benevides at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> During the Archetypes tests I had problem building the Enterprise
>>>> version because BOMs 1.0.4.Final-redhat-wfk-1 wasn't released yet.
>>>>
>>>> We had similar problem like the one opened by Max Andersen on
>>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JDF-230 - I'm adding him to this thread.
>>>>
>>>> Shouldn't in this case use the BOM from WFK 2.1
>>>> http://maven.repository.redhat.com/techpreview/wfk2/2.1.0/maven-repository/com/redhat/jboss/wfk/boms/jboss-javaee-6.0-with-errai/
>>>> ? - But that would cause another problem with the actual archetypes
>>>> because the groupId was changed from org.jboss.bom to
>>>> com.redhat.jboss.wfk.boms - The archetype bom references
>>>> https://github.com/rafabene/jboss-as-archetype/blob/3d9a6f3d9313515354b7418d20561f21c5f79b46/jboss-javaee6-webapp-archetype/src/main/resources/archetype-resources/pom.xml#L93-L97
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think that we'll need to keep EAP bom '1.0.2.Final-redhat-1'  like
>>>> described on JDF-230 and them think a little bit more on how to have
>>>> these archetypes aligned to WFK.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Em 18/04/13 09:57, Rafael Benevides escreveu:
>>>>> Makes sense! I'll update the PR.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Em 18/04/13 09:13, Pete Muir escreveu:
>>>>>> Right, that one is WFK, so it should track WFK.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 18 Apr 2013, at 04:09, Karel Piwko <kpiwko at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My understanding of the situation was the archetype contains it its
>>>>>>> metadata
>>>>>>> line [1]:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Target Product: WFK
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Therefore, archetype should take precedence of WFK BOM version over
>>>>>>> EAP BOM
>>>>>>> version if it exists for particular BOM.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So BOM version will differ per archetype. Sometimes, we'll even have
>>>>>>> two
>>>>>>> versions, as products do no distribute all BOM set anymore.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Karel
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>> https://github.com/rafabene/jboss-as-archetype/blob/3d9a6f3d9313515354b7418d20561f21c5f79b46/jboss-html5-mobile-archetype/src/main/resources/archetype-resources/README.md
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 13:28:44 -0300
>>>>>>> Rafael Benevides <benevides at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Today Karel made a comment on a Archetype PR that needs an answer:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The Archetypes uses the 1.0.2.Final-redhat-1 version to as the
>>>>>>>> "jboss-bom-enterprise-version" from EAP
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But Karel asked if shouldn't it use 1.0.4.Final-redhat-wfk-1 from WFK?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What it the supposed version for "jboss-bom-enterprise-version" in
>>>>>>>> Archetypes ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>