[jdf-dev] [new organization] BOMs repository split

Pete Muir pmuir at redhat.com
Thu Jul 11 10:55:33 EDT 2013


Could you open a JDF issue?

On 11 Jul 2013, at 15:55, Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com> wrote:

> I'm happy with that.
> 
> On 11 Jul 2013, at 14:30, Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel at hibernate.org> wrote:
> 
>> Sorry for taking so long to think about this issue. If that's still
>> relevant, here is what I think. We should indeed have a BOM including
>> ORM and a different one including Hibernate Search with the second
>> having a dependency on the first.
>> 
>> The reasons that lead to this are:
>> 
>> - JDG and WFK use Hibernate Search
>> - EAP uses ORM
>> - HSearch depends on ORM
>> - HSearch life cycle is faster than ORM's
>> 
>> Emmanuel
>> 
>> On Fri 2013-07-05 18:50, Pete Muir wrote:
>>> Both mixins and inheritance are supported.
>>> 
>>> On 5 Jul 2013, at 17:31, Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel at hibernate.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I don't know. Can you mixin BOMs or are they rigidly hierarchical?
>>>> 
>>>> On 5 juil. 2013, at 18:09, Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> So, do we have a -with-hibernate-orm and -with-hibernate-search BOM?
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 5 Jul 2013, at 16:40, Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel at hibernate.org> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Fri 2013-07-05 11:47, Rafael Benevides wrote:
>>>>>>> As part of the plan, the BOMs will be splited according to its product: 
>>>>>>> EAP or WFK
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Today there are some BOMs that is distributed in both products. My 
>>>>>>> question is what we should do about them? Move it to EAP or move it to WFK?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The worst if keeping it in both repos.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> These are the boms that have release on eap 6.1 and wfk 2.2
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> - with-deltaspike
>>>>>>> - with-errai
>>>>>>> - with-hibernate
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> With Hibernate ORM being at the center of EAP's persistence
>>>>>> implementation, ORM should be in a BOM shared by anyone seeding off EAP.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hibernate Search being used by WFK, Data Services and JBoss Data Grid
>>>>>> it's quite more complicated but again some "common libs" used by a
>>>>>> common set of versions of EAP, WFK and SOA.
>>>>>> But I'm sure, at least initially that we will need to have some
>>>>>> exceptions esp until the search support for JDG matures enough.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> It's somehow tied ot the layered architecture and the idea of a core
>>>>>> shared by compatible platforms.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> That's a general view but we should discuss on email (or if we have to
>>>>>> on a call) the exact requirements and needs of these BOMs to come to the
>>>>>> proper solution.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Emmanuel
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> jdf-dev mailing list
>>>>>> jdf-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
>>>>> 
>>> 
> 




More information about the jdf-dev mailing list