[jsr-314-open] Inconsistency between Spec and XSD for include-view-params

[Pete Muir]

On 4 Aug 2009, at 23:54, Dan Allen wrote:

> NG> 2. it's really inconsistent and weird to have dashes-in-the-name- 
> of-an-
> NG> xml-attribute. For example, we use camelCase for actionListener:
>
> Your points are well taken, but we did decide on this syntax.
>
> NG>     <h:commandButton actionListener="#{myBean.actionListener}" />

AFAIK you are comparing what appears in a JSF view definition with  
what appears in faces-config.xml - it's standard in faces-config.xml  
to use dashes, not camel case (in fact that is the convention in all  
xml - it's JSF pages that aren't in line here).