[jsr-314-open] [JSF 2.1 NEW] composite component namespace simplification

[Dan Allen]

> One other point to think about. The reason we are sticking with a valid XML
>> namespace syntax is because, if you recall, the goal in the future is to
>> recognize the view template as a pure XML document that can leverage all of
>> the great XML tooling that is already out there w/o any special plugins. We
>> can have an XSD generated automatically (or hand written) and then you get
>> tag completion on your new, shiny composite components. If we abandon XML
>> rules, we jeopordize that vision. (proposal for all that is
>> pending...somewhere in my 1000 things to do)
>>
>
> Thanks for that clarification, Dan. I hate to admit it, but I didn't
> realize that all along. :)
>

Sure thing. And when you see how awesome it is going to be to have pure XML,
you'll be jumping for joy, I'm sure of it ;) That proposal got bumped up in
my list ;)

-Dan

-- 
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597

http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jsr-314-open-mirror/attachments/20091211/eeb06977/attachment.html