[jsr-314-open] [JSF 2.1 NEW] composite component namespace simplification

[Dan Allen]

On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 11:17 PM, Martin Marinschek
<mmarinschek at apache.org>wrote:

> Hi guys,
>
> very useful discussion.
>
> I like a) the most, and my +10 for the URN-version for the core taglibs as
> well. Beautiful!
>
> I think it actually has to be a), so that we are inline with our
> specifications for the core taglibs, and that we don´t pollute the namespace
> too much.
>

The lobbyists have been successful. I switch my vote to (a).


>
> I´m sitting right here imaginating there comes the day were I don`t have to
> tell developers to copy out the header "from some other file".
>

Exactly! In fact, I just did that tonight! I do that every time I have to
create a new XHTML file (without an IDE). I have to search my system for my
trust "steal me" template and paste it in. But here, I can do it from
memory!

<f:view xmlns:f="jsf:core" xmlns:h="jsf:html">
</f:view>

-Dan

-- 
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597

http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jsr-314-open-mirror/attachments/20091213/52c19b77/attachment.html