[jsr-314-open] [jsf2.next] <h:head> vs. <head>

Tue Dec 15 13:02:05 EST 2009

2009/12/15 Lincoln Baxter, III <lincolnbaxter at gmail.com>

> It would be nice if it "just worked", and jsf would automatically
> add/detect he right place to link scripts & stylesheets.
>
> I'm all for almost anything that removes developer responsibilities and
> makes jsf easier to use.
>
+1. I always pitch h:head and h:body as necessary to coordinate with
resource relocation from h:outputScript and h:outputStylesheet, but it would
be great if you could just use <head> and <body> instead, and have
everything work.


david

> Lincoln Baxter III
> http://ocpsoft.com
> http://scrumshark.com
> Keep it simple.
>
> On Dec 15, 2009 11:44 AM, "Roger Kitain" <Roger.Kitain at sun.com> wrote:
>
> Yeah we'd have to revisit the way we do resource relocation possibly - or
> make it more intrinsic.
>
>  Andy Schwartz wrote: > > Branching off the HTML5 thread... > > Jason Lee
> wrote: >> >> On 12/15/09 ...
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jsr-314-open-mirror/attachments/20091215/94eeb596/attachment.html