[jsr-314-open] [jsf2.next] <h:head> vs. <head>

Wed Dec 16 11:25:05 EST 2009

Thanks Roger!

david

2009/12/16 Roger Kitain <Roger.Kitain at sun.com>

> I've filed this as "Implicit Resource Relocation":
> https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=702
>
> -roger
>
> David Geary wrote:
>
>> 2009/12/15 Jim Driscoll <Jim.Driscoll at sun.com <mailto:
>> Jim.Driscoll at sun.com>>
>>
>>
>>    Could someone please file this as a spec RFE?
>>
>>
>> Lincoln?!? You were the last to respond, buddy. :)
>>
>>
>> david
>>
>>
>>    We'll have to do a performance test to really see the
>>    implications, but it does seem like it would be useful to have this.
>>
>>    Jim
>>
>>
>>    On 12/15/09 12:04 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:
>>
>>        I'd even like to see it add <head> if not provided. Would that
>>        be too
>>        overreaching?
>>
>>        Lincoln Baxter III
>>        http://ocpsoft.com
>>        http://scrumshark.com
>>        Keep it simple.
>>
>>            On Dec 15, 2009 1:02 PM, "David Geary"
>>            <clarity.training at gmail.com
>>            <mailto:clarity.training at gmail.com>
>>            <mailto:clarity.training at gmail.com
>>            <mailto:clarity.training at gmail.com>>> wrote:
>>
>>            2009/12/15 Lincoln Baxter, III <lincolnbaxter at gmail.com
>>            <mailto:lincolnbaxter at gmail.com>
>>            <mailto:lincolnbaxter at gmail.com
>>
>>            <mailto:lincolnbaxter at gmail.com>>>
>>
>>
>>            > > It would be nice if it "just worked", and jsf would
>>            automatically
>>            add/detect he right place to l...
>>
>>            +1. I always pitch h:head and h:body as necessary to
>>            coordinate with
>>            resource relocation from h:outputScript and
>>            h:outputStylesheet, but it
>>            would be great if you could just use <head> and <body>
>>            instead, and
>>            have everything work.
>>
>>
>>            david
>>
>>            > > Lincoln Baxter III > http://ocpsoft.com >
>>            http://scrumshark.com >
>>            Keep it simple. >> >> On Dec 1...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jsr-314-open-mirror/attachments/20091216/96587777/attachment.html 