[jsr-314-open] first post on jsr-314-public

[Lincoln Baxter III]

I'm fine with explaining that it's there for voiced opinions, but tell
me again, is this something that will be resolved and synced to a
mailing list once we get all of that sorted out?

What is the expectation we'd like to set? 


>         The public forums serve two purposes:
>         
>         1. To allow the public to notify us of a deficiency in the
>         spec, or submit a feature request
>         2. To allow community members to discuss amongst themselves 


A few thoughts:

#1 - I'm not sure. Should we just point them to the issue tracker? That
would streamline the process, however limiting public visibility to the
initial discussion, and I like discussion.

#2 - Sure.

Any others?

---
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.com
http://scrumshark.com
"Keep it Simple" 

On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 22:27 -0500, Dan Allen wrote:

> Lincoln (and other editors of .org),
> 
> We we come to a consensus, we should probably explain the role of the
> jsr-314-public forum on www.javaserverfaces.org (just so people
> understand why it is there and set some expectations).
> 
> -Dan
> 
> 
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>         We have our first post on jsr-314-public by a community member
>         (okay, so he is an EG member on JSR-299, but it still counts).
>         
>         http://wiki.jcp.org/boards/index.php?t=3049
>         
>         Not to give you guys more work, but occasionally we need to
>         monitor this forum and decide if we want to "pick up" and
>         issue and bring it into design. Here's how I think the process
>         will go:
>         
>         1. Get clarification from community about the issue (if
>         necessary).
>         2. Post that we have taken this up as an issue for design in
>         the EG (they can follow as an observer, unless of course they
>         have post access)
>         
>         Naturally with two places to discuss, there is the risk of
>         creating parallel threads. Just remember that the public
>         forums are there for two reasons:
>         
>         1. To allow the public to notify us of a deficiency in the
>         spec or a feature request
>         2. To allow community members to discuss amongst themselves
>         
>         It's a public forum. So they should do most of the talking and
>         we do most of the listening ;)
>         
>         If you have other ideas about how it should go, please share
>         it. I'm just laying out my perspective here.
>         
>         -Dan
>         
>         -- 
>         Dan Allen
>         Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
>         Registered Linux User #231597
>         
>         http://mojavelinux.com
>         http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
>         http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Dan Allen
> Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
> Registered Linux User #231597
> 
> http://mojavelinux.com
> http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
> http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jsr-314-open-mirror/attachments/20091216/1bf226f1/attachment.html