[jsr-314-open] [ADMIN] JSF Wikipedia Page
Lincoln Baxter III
lincolnbaxter at gmail.com
Wed Dec 16 19:36:01 EST 2009
Whatever we think is best, I'm just getting it started ;)
---
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.com
http://scrumshark.com
"Keep it Simple"
On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 19:25 -0500, Dan Allen wrote:
> Good point Jason. As the primary link, could you make it this link:
> http://java.sun.com/javaee/javaserverfaces/index.jsp. Then, just
> create a short section about the EG's dedication to openness and the
> creation of the www.javaserverfaces.org root node. Because really,
> www.javaserverfaces.org is something created by the EG rather than
> Sun, who really owns the technology definition (I guess).
>
> -Dan
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Jason Lee <jason at steeplesoft.com>
> wrote:
>
> >From the hip, I'm not sure The Powers That Be at Sun are
> going to like the JSF Home Page point to javaserverfaces.org
> and not the Sun page. Not sure how best to handle that,
> though.
>
>
>
>
> On 12/16/09 6:19 PM, Lincoln Baxter III wrote:
>
> > I've taken the liberty of updating the JSF page on
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JavaServer_Faces
> >
> > I don't know how many of you have read it, but it was
> > atrocious: horrible grammar, entire paragraphs that added
> > almost no value (or should have been included in a section
> > for "details nobody needs to know,") and generally too much
> > text that said too little.
> >
> > Notably, I removed the comparison to other frameworks
> > because it was rather uninformative (save the .net version)
> > These features can be pulled back in, if we deem them to be
> > accurate and beneficial to the audience (which on wikipedia,
> > should be considered, "interested academics and business
> > researchers",) so such a comparison may be valuable, but I
> > assert that we should re-evaluate the manner in which is it
> > done. The focus should be on JSF, not the other frameworks.
> > (This section was almost as long as the rest of the
> > article.)
> >
> > I've moved the focus from JSF1 to JSF2, while still keeping
> > some references to JSF1 functionality. JSF2 is the new
> > standard, and I've made that clear.
> >
> > Please feel free to add/update - it is our responsibility as
> > the experts to make sure that the correct knowledge is on
> > here. My focus is on clarity and understanding, but if
> > someone more technical wants to elaborate on anything I've
> > done, or add new information, go ahead, and I'll try to make
> > sure it lays out well and flows intuitively.
> >
> > You can see all my changes here:
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=JavaServer_Faces&action=historysubmit&diff=332153215&oldid=332141364
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > ---
> > Lincoln Baxter, III
> > http://ocpsoft.com
> > http://scrumshark.com
> > "Keep it Simple"
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Jason Lee, SCJP
> President, Oklahoma City Java Users Group
> Senior Java Developer, Sun Microsystems
> http://blogs.steeplesoft.com
>
>
>
>
> --
> Dan Allen
> Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
> Registered Linux User #231597
>
> http://mojavelinux.com
> http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
> http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jsr-314-open-mirror/attachments/20091216/eb45b0b7/attachment.html
More information about the jsr-314-open-mirror
mailing list