[jsr-314-open] mailinglist: looking for immediate action

[Dan Allen]

>
> DA> We certainly don't need both jsr-314-eg at jcp.org and
> DA> jsr-314-observers at jcp.org.
>
> I don't know about that, but I do know we need jsr-314-eg at jcp.org to be
> an EG private email list.  Contractual discussions regarding licenses
> and other topics that vendors feel sensitive about discussing openly
> need a place to happen.  jsr-314-eg at jcp.org has been and will continue
> to be that place.
>

Ah. I see. That makes sense. So to revise my statement, we don't need it for
API discussions ;)


>
> Thanks for scratching your itch on this Dan.  Your advocacy for
> open-ness fits in with the continuing push of JCP to be more open.
>

:)

-Dan

-- 
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597

http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jsr-314-open-mirror/attachments/20091113/4a166d97/attachment.html