[jsr-314-open] revisiting the JSR-314 openness policy

[Ed Burns]

>>>>> On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:00:28 +0100, Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com> said:

PM> On 18 Sep 2009, at 00:09, Dan Allen wrote:

>> Our first choice for request #1 is to allow all subscribed members  
>> of the jsr-314-open list to post, with moderation of a person's  
>> inaugural post (webbeans-dev uses this approach, for instance). The  
>> second choice would be to have a separate list open to the  
>> community. In either case, both lists should satisfy request #2.

PM> My preference would be for there to be two email lists, both with  
PM> public, non-password-protected, archives. The first is the EG list.  
PM> The second is the a discussion list. A regular member of the EG can  
PM> post unmoderated to either list. Any subscriber can post to the  
PM> discussion list. If a member of the community is an expert on a  
PM> particular sub-topic, we should pull them into the EG list, using  
PM> moderation to allow their posts through.

I like Pete's suggestion.  Dan, is the lack of email gateway the only
roadblock to using the existing facility on the new jcp.org site?

Ed

-- 
| ed.burns at sun.com  | office: 408 884 9519 OR x31640
| homepage:         | http://ridingthecrest.com/