[jsr-314-open-mirror] [jsr-314-open] New anti-JSF blog entry: http://facemetal.wordpress.com/2010/07/19/jsf/

[Blake Sullivan]

There is no way to partition the beans to the pieces that consume them.  This causes two problems for large applications:
1) The names need to be made longer for uniqueness
2) All of the bean information needs to be loaded at startup.  This inefficiency is extremely apparent during development.

-- Blake Sullivan


On Jul 21, 2010, at 7:56 AM, Ed Burns wrote:

>>>>>> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 09:31:32 +0200, Martin Marinschek <mmarinschek at apache.org> said:
> 
> MM> The stuff which is still lacking from JSF, which he partially mentions:
> 
> MM> - back button support
> MM> - double click handling
> MM> - pretty URLs
> 
> MM> we should definitely address that at some point of time.
> 
> Thank you so much for your summary.  The double click handling is being
> covered by Roger as part of [559-SynchronizerToken]. 
> 
> MM> And: something he mentions I also think is not really good is the
> MM> "global" managed bean scope. It would be good to have a way to let
> MM> managed beans live only in a reduced, page (or conversation) visible
> MM> scope.
> 
> Doesn't CDI give you this?
> 
> Ed
> -- 
> | edburns at oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017
> | homepage:          | http://ridingthecrest.com/
> | 18 work days until JSF 2.1 Milestone 2