[jsr-314-open-mirror] [jsr-314-open] [545-VisitHints] proposal

[Martin Marinschek]

Hi Leo

> I think (and it is my personal opinion) it is preferred to use
> "javax.faces.visit.SKIP_ITERATION". If some user needs to override visitTree
> (example: an alternate implementation of UIData), he/she should be aware of
> this facesContext attribute. The only point on the api that does not use
> javax.faces for a facesContext attribute is this one:

yes, sure - Andy just meant if we can do this if it is not yet in the
specification. I would guess we should do so, so that people can move
smoothly to 2.1.

> public abstract class FaceletContext extends ELContext
> {
>     // TODO: REPORT this aberration to the EG
>     public static final String FACELET_CONTEXT_KEY =
> "com.sun.faces.facelets.FACELET_CONTEXT";

that should be changed as well!

best regards,

Martin

-- 

http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces