[jsr-314-open-mirror] [jsr-314-open] [2.1 Spec Review] Transient State [Was: Fix UIData state saving model]
Martin Marinschek
mmarinschek at apache.org
Wed Oct 27 07:07:42 EDT 2010
Hi Ed,
but don't forget we need to be able to put transient state in from the
outside. Whatever solution you choose, this must be possible.
best regards,
Martin
On 10/26/10, Ed Burns <edward.burns at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 08:45:05 +0200, Martin Marinschek
>>>>>> <mmarinschek at apache.org> said:
>
> MM> Hi guys,
> MM> ok, sounds good - let's keep it at your suggestion. I will live with
> MM> the difference in APIs.
>
> MM> Question: do we also need an eval - again, to keep symmetry?
>
> I happen to agree with Martin on this, not Blake and Andy.
>
> I'm composing an omnibus reply for JSF 2.1 open issues presently.
>
> Ed
>
> --
> | edward.burns at oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017
> | homepage: | http://ridingthecrest.com/
> | 11 work days until German Oracle User's Group Conference
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
More information about the jsr-314-open-mirror
mailing list