[jsr-314-open-mirror] [jsr-314-open] [859-MultiActionComponent] RESOLVED (was: Re: Composite components only support one action) attribute (review of issue 859)

[Jakob Korherr]

Hi,

Here is the related spec issue for the "implementation-pulling"
approach: https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=901

Regards,
Jakob

2010/10/29 Ed Burns <edward.burns at oracle.com>:
>>>>>> On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 07:52:36 +0200, Martin Marinschek <mmarinschek at apache.org> said:
>
> MM> Hi guys,
> MM> targetAttributeName is problematic for me if we want to move to a
> MM> world "without" the target attribute. If we really want to allow
> MM> everything to work in this way, we need the implementation to pull the
> MM> method-expressions in - and not the interface to push them down.
>
> Yes, I understand.  We're working towards that.  But we're not going to
> be removing anything from the API.  We'll just document that there is a
> better way to do it.
>
> MM> In such a world, the attribute name "targetAttributeName" is
> MM> meaningless, at least to my understanding.
>
> Your comments have been noted.
>
> Ed
> --
> | edward.burns at oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017
> | homepage:               | http://ridingthecrest.com/
> |  8 work days until German Oracle User's Group Conference
>



-- 
Jakob Korherr

blog: http://www.jakobk.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/jakobkorherr
work: http://www.irian.at