[keycloak-dev] timestamp repo release

[Marek Posolda]

In case you are not aware, I would like to point you to 
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-223 which looks like a Resteasy 
packaging issue. Actually I reported it to KEYCLOAK jira because I 
reproduced it during deployment of Keycloak:-)

Marek

On 9.12.2013 14:51, Bill Burke wrote:
> You win.  We'll release early January.  I honestly have a bunch of
> Resteasy work to do this week anyways.
>
> On 12/9/2013 8:28 AM, Gabriel Cardoso wrote:
>> I share the same view as you, Stian. Also, new year, new project,
>>    sounds better :)
>>
>> On Dec 7, 2013, at 8:20 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
>>
>>> Maybe I didn't make it clear enough, but the reason I was thinking to
>>> hold off until after Christmas is that I think it might have a bigger
>>> impact if released in January. I certainly will be reading less blogs,
>>> emails, etc. over the holidays, and would assume that quite a lot of
>>> other people would as well.
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke at redhat.com <mailto:bburke at redhat.com>>
>>>> To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian at redhat.com <mailto:stian at redhat.com>>
>>>> Cc: keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>>> Sent: Friday, 6 December, 2013 11:52:07 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] timestamp repo release
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 12/6/2013 12:34 PM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Marek has also found a bunch of issues that'll need fixing for M1.
>>>>>
>>>> I don't see any blocker bugs.
>>>>
>>>>> With Christmas being pretty close now, and most people going into
>>>>> holiday
>>>>> mode, I was thinking it might be better to hold off until the New Years?
>>>>> We could still circulate a timestamped version internally though.
>>>>>
>>>> Nah.  We have enough to do an alpha release.  The bulk of the work is
>>>> making install/bootstrap/distro/demo as ironclad and as easy to use and
>>>> setup as possible.  As well as the initial documentation.  IMO, we have
>>>> enough working features to release an alpha.
>>>>
>>>>> For the website we should make it use the bootstrap theme that
>>>>> WildFly and
>>>>> Hibernate uses, it looks a bit more fresh then what we have now.
>>>>> Also, we
>>>>> need a logo!
>>>>>
>>>> Need to find out where they host these sites.  Not sure if its openshift
>>>> or not.  FYI, I did buy keycloak.org <http://keycloak.org> about 8
>>>> months ago.  It points to
>>>> jboss.org/keycloak <http://jboss.org/keycloak> at the moment.
>>>>
>>>>> Once we've done the release it would be great to do a series of blog
>>>>> posts,
>>>>> and maybe some shorter videos that shows off a single feature (2 min
>>>>> length ish)
>>>>>
>>>> I'm planning on doing a vid tutorial on the 2 demos.  One is our current
>>>> demo all set up via a file import.  The other is actually manually
>>>> setting up the demo via the admin console (creating the realm, apps,
>>>> roles, users, role mappings, oauth client, scope, etc...)
>>>>
>>>> I wanted the doco to link to these 2 min vids too.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Bill Burke
>>>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>>>> http://bill.burkecentral.com
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> keycloak-dev mailing list
>>> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>>
>> --
>> Gabriel Cardoso
>> GateIn Portal | User Experience Designer
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> keycloak-dev mailing list
>> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>>